FANDOM


  • New equipment

    5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30
    5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Equipment 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Full 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Character

    Equipment rewards

    Name Quantity
    Top 5: 1st ~ 5th place (聯合艦隊基幹艦隊)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card 1
    Skilled Sonar Personnel + Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes)Skilled Sonar Personnel + Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes) 214 Card 1
    5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.305inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card 2
    Top 20: 6th ~ 20th place (主力艦隊第一群)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card 1
    Skilled Sonar Personnel + Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes)Skilled Sonar Personnel + Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes) 214 Card 1
    5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.305inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card 1
    Top 100: 21st ~ 100th place (主力艦隊第二群)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card 1
    Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes)Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes) 213 Card 1
    5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.305inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card 1
    Top 500: 101st ~ 500th place (主力艦隊第三群)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card 1
    5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.305inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card 1

    Top 5: 1st ~ 5th place (聯合艦隊基幹艦隊)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card×1 Skilled Sonar Personnel + Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes) 214 Card×1 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card×2
     
    Top 20: 6th ~ 20th place (主力艦隊第一群)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card×1 Skilled Sonar Personnel + Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes) 214 Card×1 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card×1
     
    Top 100: 21st ~ 100th place (主力艦隊第二群)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card×1 Late Model Bow Torpedo Mount (6 tubes) 213 Card×1 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card×1
     
    Top 500: 101st ~ 500th place (主力艦隊第三群)
    46cm Triple Gun Mount Kai 276 Card×1 5inch Single Gun Mount Mk.30 284 Card×1
     
     

    Developer Tweets

    JP

    明日【2/28(火)】夜以降に、月次作戦【一月作戦】結果情報を「艦これ」ゲーム画面下【情報】でお知らせする予定です。また、月次作戦トップランカー提督に贈る武勲褒賞を、同発表以降に順次配信してまいります。

    JP

    こ、こほん…明日はもちろん水曜日です!明日【2/28(水)】夜以降に、月次作戦【一月作戦】結果情報を「艦これ」ゲーム画面下【情報】でお知らせする予定です。そして、月次作戦トップランカー提督に贈る武勲褒賞を、同発表以降に順次配信してまいります。

    JP

    本日【2/28(水)】夜以降に、月次作戦【一月作戦】結果情報を「艦これ」ゲーム画面下【情報】でお知らせする予定です。また、月次作戦トップランカー提督に贈る武勲褒賞を、同発表以降に順次配信してまいります。インパクトはないけれど、ある種インパクトがあるあの砲熕兵装も登場予定です。

      Loading editor
    • Fletcher class incoming? PogChamp

        Loading editor
    • They did say (as usual) something about it being stock equipment of a new shipgirl in spring.

        Loading editor
    • As long as it's not Shibafu again... sigh...

        Loading editor
    • Any infamous Fletcher in the past?

      I'd love for her to be drawn by Shibafu. *smirk

      But, eh, none of Shibafu girls in this game has white hair.

        Loading editor
    • Would've been funny (and salt inducing) if USS Johnston was introduced right now in the middle of the event...

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel wrote:
      Would've been funny (and salt inducing) if USS Johnston was introduced right now in the middle of the event...

      Why would they do it though? :v

        Loading editor
    • Shinhwalee wrote: As long as it's not Shibafu again... sigh...

      I'd love one instead.

        Loading editor
    • Nodokor wrote:
      Why would they do it though? :v

      For the salts XD

      To be serious though, Yahagi was introduced right in the middle of that infamous IBS event, and with sakura rainbow rarity to boot. Realistically though, it's rather disrespectful for the top rankers and they can't really afford another backlash right after Intrepid.

      Shinhwalee wrote:
      As long as it's not Shibafu again... sigh...
      But what if all the ships from now onwards are drawn by Shibafu?
        Loading editor
    • trash

        Loading editor
    • Fletcher class (175 boate) and Shibafu seem to be made for each other. Yes please.

        Loading editor
    • Tennousu wrote:
      Any infamous Fletcher in the past?

      I'd love for her to be drawn by Shibafu. *smirk

      But, eh, none of Shibafu girls in this game has white hair.

      there's an entire pantheon of notable Fletchers.

      William D. Porter once accidentally fired a torp at Iowa and later in the war sunk by a kamikaze with no casualties

      O'Bannon once used potatoes to attack a Japanese submarine

      Radford sank I-19 and was known as the "Hunter-Killer Queen" or HUK

      Fletcher herself was present in IBS and Tassafaronga

      Heermann survived the Battle off Samar and participated in Ten-Go

      Johnston led the DD charge in Samar

      ...and more.

        Loading editor
    • There were also Fletchers that were transfered to the JMSDF after the war. I could see see the artists and devs having fun with that. They were at Leyte too iirc.

        Loading editor
    • What about willie D?
      Kappa
        Loading editor
    • Shinhwalee wrote:
      As long as it's not Shibafu again... sigh...

      I'll take three Shibafu-blessed US DDs, please.

        Loading editor
    • The little blurb specifically mentions Taffy 3, so I'm guessing Johnston.

        Loading editor
    • WellSpokenMan130 wrote: The little blurb specifically mentions Taffy 3, so I'm guessing Johnston.

      There is also Samuel B. Roberts, Hoel and Heerman too btw.

        Loading editor
    • Dandan550 wrote:

      WellSpokenMan130 wrote:

      There is also Samuel B. Roberts, Hoel and Heerman too btw.

      Sure, but out of the 4, my money would be on the Johnston. Sammy B as a little brat that terrorizes everyone and only listens to Kongou would be hilarious though.

        Loading editor
    • ay sir, maybe jervis get a sister.... same uniform anyway :p

        Loading editor
    • Fletcher hype, even after Intrepid got Shibafu-ed and Fletcher is gonna be next.

        Loading editor
    • Why the **** Devs adding more US ships when Yoshinori is busy with other stuff ?! Akira is fine for the job but f**k Shibafu ! Stop being the Devs's new pimp (Or improve your drawing skills for KC damnit)



      It is to troll Foreign players isn't it ?

        Loading editor
    • i honestly don't even mind Shibafu's art.

      also, that's gonna be a shitton of new DDs.. all 175 of them.

        Loading editor
    • Mystia Lore. wrote:
      Why the **** Devs adding more US ships when Yoshinori is busy with other stuff ?! Akira is fine for the job but f**k Shibafu ! Stop being the Devs's new pimp (Or improve your drawing skills for KC damnit)


      It is to troll Foreign players isn't it ?

      You mean the ones who weren't supposed to be playing and have to use cookies/proxy? Yeah, the devs are monsters to hurt their feelings.

        Loading editor
    • Bunnyroll wrote:

      Mystia Lore. wrote:
      Why the **** Devs adding more US ships when Yoshinori is busy with other stuff ?! Akira is fine for the job but f**k Shibafu ! Stop being the Devs's new pimp (Or improve your drawing skills for KC damnit)


      It is to troll Foreign players isn't it ?

      You mean the ones who weren't supposed to be playing and have to use cookies/proxy? Yeah, the devs are monsters to hurt their feelings.

      Excuse me? I play by their rules and even gave them money

        Loading editor
    • Kurokami11 wrote:

      Excuse me? I play by their rules and even gave them money

      From the moment you tweak settings to play when DMM doesn't allow foreign players (and redirects you to a list of their other games that are available out of Japan!), you're most definitely not playing by their rules.

      I'm also a paying foreign player, and even if they do us a favor and kindly ignore we're playing, that doesn't change the fact that we're not their intended public and our opinions don't really count. If they wanted our opinions, they'd have an English version.

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel wrote:

      To be serious though, Yahagi was introduced right in the middle of that infamous IBS event, and with sakura rainbow rarity to boot. Realistically though, it's rather disrespectful for the top rankers and they can't really afford another backlash right after Intrepid.

      Was there really that much backlash regarding Intrepid?

      I mean, I'm aware that there was backlash here and amongst many of the foreign players, but I have not heard of an extensive amount of backlash on the Japanese side of things. Yes, I know there has been some (even death threats on Shibafu), but the impression I've gotten is that the reaction has been pretty 'meh'...at least in comparison the foreign players. 

        Loading editor
    • I think the #IntrepidGate is over. It raised lots of complains the day it was revealed, but right now I think it's just "Meh, whatever" at worse.

      I still don't like Intrepid art at all but even if I send death threats to Shibafu/Devs/DMM/Kadokawa it won't change anything so... Deal with it ?

        Loading editor
    • craftable JOHNSTON in construction with Gambier Bay as flagship

        Loading editor
    • or possibly, ADDITIONAL REWARD for those who finished E-7 this event and for the ending of Phase 1 KC, and onwars to Phase 2 KC though its just my speculation on this 2 points

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel
      Ar-cen-ciel removed this reply because:
      Redundant
      03:02, March 2, 2018
      This reply has been removed
    • Mystia Lore. wrote:
      I think the #IntrepidGate is over. It raised lots of complains the day it was revealed, but right now I think it's just "Meh, whatever" at worse.

      I still don't like Intrepid art at all but even if I send death threats to Shibafu/Devs/DMM/Kadokawa it won't change anything so... Deal with it ?

      ...which is exactly what some folks said would happen about the whole thing; 'give it a week or so and nobody will care anymore'.

      I won't post my thoughts on the art other than it's 'meh' and a lost opportunity/poor choice because I want to keep things more or less on-topic.

      This being said, I still wonder if the backlash was that significant in the first place that Kadokawa and/or the Devs will adjust how they do things in general.

      Edit - so folks would know who I'm responding to

        Loading editor
    • Shinhwalee wrote:
      As long as it's not Shibafu again... sigh...

      Cue O'Bannon is the incoming fletcher.... and she was drawn by Shibafu.....



      you got a problem of having the infamous potato obess fandom kamusu being drawn by our beloved potato face artist? :P

        Loading editor
    • You don't have to tweak anything to play on Android. I would not be at all surprised to see English supported in phase 2. Companies want money, even Japanese ones. Intrepid's problem isn't Shibafu. It's that it's sub par Shibafu. It's not that Intrepid looks bad next to Saratoga. It's that she looks bad next to Hiryuu Kai Ni that is frustrating.

      Shibafu isn't my first choice to do the first Fletcher class, but if it's on par with his better work, it will be fine.

        Loading editor
    • So, we'll get a US DD as a drop during the next event (because it looks like ASDIC/Jervis to me).

        Loading editor
    • I dont get why your saying " because it looks like ASDIC/Jervis" related to this gun. How come you get to that conclusion when this is a very USN equipment, I have never heard any british ever get this

        Loading editor
    • Shinhwalee wrote: As long as it's not Shibafu again... sigh...

      If it is Shibafu, Im gonna kill myself by eating a tons of frnch fries

        Loading editor
    • Oh great, the description of Mk30 mentioned the REAL American DEs... Time to reclassify Kaiboukans as PF (as we should have done years ago), finally?

        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote: Oh great, the description of Mk30 mentioned the REAL American DEs... Time to reclassify Kaiboukans as PF (as we should have done years ago), finally?

      Yes please.

      But seriously though, how would Tanaka classify the real destroyer escort as? It would be best if they were given their own class of 護衛駆逐艦 (goei kuchikukan), but I have some fears that they would classify them as destroyers (with weaker stats).

      Granted devs did introduce CVLs as proper category when the IJN proper had no such classification, but still...

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel wrote:

      Vcharng wrote: Oh great, the description of Mk30 mentioned the REAL American DEs... Time to reclassify Kaiboukans as PF (as we should have done years ago), finally?

      Yes please.

      But seriously though, how would Tanaka classify the real destroyer escort as? It would be best if they were given their own class of 護衛駆逐艦 (goei kuchikukan), but I have some fears that they would classify them as destroyers (with weaker stats)

      Granted devs did introduce CVLs as proper category when the IJN proper had no such classification, but still...

      I don't think KC would classify ships THAT far. They didn't even distinguish CVE and CVL, why should they distinguish DE and DD?
      As for CVL, it has to be done, classifying the Chitose as the same as Akagi would mean that those CVLs will be treated as "just a smaller CV", and seriously limiting their usage in combat.
      DEs, on the other hand, aren't principally different from DDs, their difference is simply equivalent to that between Matsu-class and Kagerou-class.
      It is even less possible, to the extent that we can declare it implausible, that DEs be classified as Kaiboukans. Classifying US DEs (especially given the fact that DEs having Mk30 are late model ones) would mean suddenly making Japanese PFs useless overnight.
      Plus, DEs can carry torpedoes, while PFs can't.

        Loading editor
    • Ah, okay, so they're basically destroyers with lower stats (with 60 or lower OASW requirement) and supply cost. Guess we'll settle for that then.

      And yeah its rather implausible for the DEs to be classified as Kaiboukans.

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel wrote: Ah, okay, so they're basically destroyers with lower stats (with 60 or lower OASW requirement) and supply cost. Guess we'll settle for that then.

      Well perhaps they will have some other special features as well. You see, DD is the most versatile category so far, we have surface warfare DD, anti-air DD, ASW DD, daihatsu DD, and the combination of all of the above.

        Loading editor
    • The equipment seems meh statwise.

        Loading editor
    • 175.158.232.98 wrote:
      I dont get why your saying " because it looks like ASDIC/Jervis" related to this gun. How come you get to that conclusion when this is a very USN equipment, I have never heard any british ever get this

      I thought it was obvious I was referring to the fact that after they relased the ASDIC series we were expecting a british DD in the Fall event, and yet we got it now (as a drop), so I meant "not soon/easily".

        Loading editor
    • Imperial Kozak wrote: The equipment seems meh statwise.

      That is not yet the best USN Destroyer guns yet.

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel wrote: And yeah its rather implausible for the DEs to be classified as Kaiboukans.

      Agreed.

      Real Coastal Defence Ships had bigger guns and resembled battleships.

      Dandan550 wrote:

      Imperial Kozak wrote: The equipment seems meh statwise.

      That is not yet the best USN Destroyer guns yet.

      I'd be expecting the best US Navy destroyer guns to be to destroyer guns what the Bofors 40mm Quadruple Autocannon Mount is to anti-aircraft weapons.

      Or is that stretching it?

        Loading editor
    • Cdc
        Loading editor
    • Imperial Kozak wrote:

      Ar-cen-ciel wrote: And yeah its rather implausible for the DEs to be classified as Kaiboukans.

      Agreed.

      Real Coastal Defence Ships had bigger guns and resembled battleships.

      Well I risk resparking the debate, but I have to spell it out either way.

      What makes the PF/Kaibokan classification a difficult thing to set in is that both USN and IJN have much bigger ships under those classification. Whenever PF was suggested to be be used for Kaibokans, opponents mentioned the Tacoma-class frigates from WW2, either because we have to adhere to USN's hullcodes or limit ourselves to WW2 classification.

      I could say a lot more but that is that for this topic. If you wanna know more, write to me in my message wall and I'll explain how the whole debate came to be.

        Loading editor
    • how many shipsfrom TAFFY-3 will be introduced in the future? would it be okay that the DEVs will only select from from this Task Unit?, just namely, JOHNSTON, SAMMY B, HOEL, HEERMAN, WHITE PLAINS, or is it possible include some more?

        Loading editor
    • Imperial Kozak wrote:

      Ar-cen-ciel wrote: And yeah its rather implausible for the DEs to be classified as Kaiboukans.

      Agreed.

      Real Coastal Defence Ships had bigger guns and resembled battleships.

      Let's not make things more complicated than it already is. Your "real" Kaiboukan was more like pre-Shimushu definition of Kaiboukans, which wasn't and will never be introduced into the game. What we are talking about here is post-1942 definition of Kaiboukans (when all those old BBs became reclassified into something else), which resembles more like the British Flower-class, which was the definition for the abbreviation PF.

        Loading editor
    • 175.158.233.2 wrote: how many shipsfrom TAFFY-3 will be introduced in the future? would it be okay that the DEVs will only select from from this Task Unit?, just namely, JOHNSTON, SAMMY B, HOEL, HEERMAN, WHITE PLAINS, or is it possible include some more?

      No, that would not be ok. Washington, Harder, Enterprise, Lexington, Yorktown, Helena, and pretty much any heavy cruiser that fought in the Solomons are ships that should be in the game.

        Loading editor
    • but the TOPIC is the "ships with 5 inch single gun Mk.30", i dont thing those ships have ever get this things except for DDs and DEs.

        Loading editor
    • WellSpokenMan130 wrote:

      No, that would not be ok. Washington, Harder, Enterprise, Lexington, Yorktown, Helena, and pretty much any heavy cruiser that fought in the Solomons are ships that should be in the game.
      Lets not jump the guns, okay? They'll come when the devs decides to implement them, if ever. But if commanding a US fleet is the main reason why you play Kantai Collection, I'll say plainly that you've chosen the wrong game. Azur Lane and Warship Girls have many more US shipgirls than Kantai Collection, and I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a full-fledged US fleet since we didn't get any US shipgirls for a year until now.
        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote:

      Imperial Kozak wrote:

      Ar-cen-ciel wrote: And yeah its rather implausible for the DEs to be classified as Kaiboukans.

      Agreed.

      Real Coastal Defence Ships had bigger guns and resembled battleships.

      Let's not make things more complicated than it already is. Your "real" Kaiboukan was more like pre-Shimushu definition of Kaiboukans, which wasn't and will never be introduced into the game. What we are talking about here is post-1942 definition of Kaiboukans (when all those old BBs became reclassified into something else), which resembles more like the British Flower-class, which was the definition for the abbreviation PF.

      Sorry.

      I just got triggered by the fact that Japan's definition of a "Coastal Defence Ship" was different than the rest of the world, and due to this, I thought Japan corrupted the term "Coastal defence Ship". As such, I had to let out some steam.

        Loading editor
    • Lets bet, this spring, which ship will Tanaka present us? JOHNSTON or SAMMY B, (my bet on JOHNSTON as it mentions "fought boldy" and "defend an Escort Carrier" which JOHNSTON qualify for this hints for 1)Heading straight to Kurita Fleet alone without orders and torp Kumano, 2)trying to divert Chikuma's fire away from Gambier Bay by firing at the cruiser)

        Loading editor
    • Ar-cen-ciel wrote:

      My interpretation of the post I was responding to was whether or not Taffy 3 should be the only US ships added to the game. No, I don't think they should be the only ones added, but I'm not in some kind of rage about the lack of US ships. I'm not sure how you got that from my post.

        Loading editor
    • WellSpokenMan130 wrote:

      Ar-cen-ciel wrote:

      My interpretation of the post I was responding to was whether or not Taffy 3 should be the only US ships added to the game. No, I don't think they should be the only ones added, but I'm not in some kind of rage about the lack of US ships. I'm not sure how you got that from my post.

      Ah, I see, thanks for clarifying that. But we've already gotten a number of US shipgirls already, it just happened that the next one would be from Taffy 3. As for future US ships, it's anyone's guess since new shipgirls are usually added during seasonal events.
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.