FANDOM


  • Dragonjet
    Dragonjet closed this thread because:
    Thanks all for the feedback, the page is now renamed to Hinted Content. Any other suggestion to the article, or any related discussion, please post it on its comments section.
    14:37, September 25, 2015

    Since the information under Future Updates had been growing, I decided to create a dedicated article for it, and is being discussed with Qunow.

    If you haven't read the section, this is on the Recent Updates article. It indicates possible future updates sourced from magazines such as Comtiq, Hobby Japan, etc, and interviews. The content will be transferred to a new article: Unofficial Sources.

    With it separated as a new article, there will be no limitations to the content and partitions that can be added. We can freely divide them into sections, and add status for each, as you can see on the existing article. It improves readability with each having its own title, instead of having to read through all texts. There will be no Future Updates collapsible on the Recent Updates page, but only a list that links to the new article.

    However, we think this is not the best title for the article, for these are not totally unofficial, and also not totally official. Sometimes, there are even official tweets that fall under this, such as Shinano hints.

    So we ask the community, what do you guys think would be the best title for this article?

    Right now: Unofficial Sources

    Best replacement title
     
    151
     
    5
     
    31
     
    7
     

    The poll was created at 03:01 on September 14, 2015, and so far 194 people voted.

    (Poll will run until the next update, 25th Sept.)

    If you have other suggestions, please comment, and we will kudos to vote for it.

    Other suggestions:

    • Potential Updates

    If you like one of these "other suggestions" please add kudos to its reply and will serve as it's number of votes.

      Loading editor
    • We can say Potential Updates. 

        Loading editor
    • Others please specify :

      Fubuki Theorems :V

        Loading editor
    • Go away Ramen :v

        Loading editor
    • Unofficial Sources is good as it is

        Loading editor
    • Hinted Content could come from both Official and Unofficial sources, as it's only a "hint"

        Loading editor
    • Hinted content is good as it is.

        Loading editor
    • Hinted or unofficial sources, If I can, I've choose both but unofficial is more vaste and don't put content limit att all, It's also a good idea.

        Loading editor
    • Hinted pertains to being potential while unofficial makes it sound the opposite.

        Loading editor
    • Unofficial sources is a pretty poor name since it sounds as though they're just speculated rumors spread around.

      I vote for hinted content.

        Loading editor
    • Falukorv source! But no, hinted or unofficial.

        Loading editor
    • Poi

        Loading editor
    • "Hinted Contents" sounds good, imo

        Loading editor
    • Hint hint. :>

        Loading editor
    • more like TTK hype bait

        Loading editor
    • Well, just why did Shinano fell into this category? It was from official twitter, and it wasn't a hint, it was completely revealed and declared.

      I would suggest "hinted upcoming contents" though.

        Loading editor
    • Call the page "The Grapevine" (which meaning comes from the song "I heard it through the Grapevine")

        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote:

      I would suggest "hinted upcoming contents" though.

      What he said.

        Loading editor
    • I think the reqponce if the same for the  big majority, It's definitly gonna by "hinted contents" :V xD .

        Loading editor
    • I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.

        Loading editor
    • Aemu wrote:
      H-content.

      Voted +1

        Loading editor
    • I vote for "Spy Intel" because spy :3

        Loading editor
    • Ramenperson wrote:
      Others please specify :

      Fubuki Theorems :V

      Yes please!

        Loading editor
    • Lushencia wrote:
      Aemu wrote:
      H-content.
      Voted +1

      Voted +1 to

      i like this one

        Loading editor
    • myth content :v

        Loading editor
    • I can't really choose between Potential Updates and Future Updates, since 'potential' implies that these new content might not appear whereas we have seen that it, sooner or later, does appear. So as an in-between option I'm for Unofficial Sources, because they sure as hell don't come from our /dear/ devs.

        Loading editor
    • Aemu wrote:
      I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.


      yes, yes, just leave it exactly like this: "H-content". the number of clicks the thread will have will be immeasurable.

        Loading editor
    • Archer88 wrote:
      Aemu wrote:
      I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.

      yes, yes, just leave it exactly like this: "H-content". the number of clicks the thread will have will be immeasurable.

      +1

        Loading editor
    • "H-Content" would make ppl open it first before doing anything else lol a perfect bait for important announcement thread

        Loading editor
    • How about "Aoba's Note"

        Loading editor
    • or even "Aoba's Report" since sometimes her report's are not accurate

        Loading editor
    • +1 to h-content

        Loading editor
    • Mix it

      Aoba's H-content

        Loading editor
    • UvebeenHAZED wrote:
      Mix it

      Aoba's H-content

      It sound so lewd...

      +100

        Loading editor
    • Aemu wrote:
      I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.

      + 1
      Really simple and easy to shorten. I doubt anyone would have trouble understanding something this simple so it is easier for all of us.

        Loading editor
    • TTK Mealmightyme wrote:
      Aemu wrote:
      I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.
      + 1
      Really simple and easy to shorten. I doubt anyone would have trouble understanding something this simple so it is easier for all of us.

      It's not about understanding, it's about misunderstanding :D

        Loading editor
    • Since the words used in the suggestions are "possible", "hinted", and even "unofficial", I'm thinking something along the lines of "Tentative Updates" or something

      Though the word "tentative" might not be known by many or be misunderstood...

      Or try combining? like "Possible Future updates"? Or is using three words not good?

      "Naval Base Proposals/Theses"

      ...and since you guys are talking about H-content maybe Akigumo can be also a good reference...

        Loading editor
    • Archer88 wrote:
      TTK Mealmightyme wrote:
      Aemu wrote:
      I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.
      + 1
      Really simple and easy to shorten. I doubt anyone would have trouble understanding something this simple so it is easier for all of us.
      It's not about understanding, it's about misunderstanding :D

      Whats there to misunderstand? ;)

        Loading editor
    • TTK Mealmightyme wrote:
      Archer88 wrote:
      TTK Mealmightyme wrote:
      Aemu wrote:
      I'm voting for H-content. "Hinted" sounds more convincing.
      + 1
      Really simple and easy to shorten. I doubt anyone would have trouble understanding something this simple so it is easier for all of us.
      It's not about understanding, it's about misunderstanding :D
      Whats there to misunderstand? ;)

      Figure that one out for yourself ;)

        Loading editor
    • ShinanoEdit

      • Status: No signs of happening yet
      • Source: Official Twitter
      • Source Date: October 2013

      Well, I really have to ask again, if it's from "official" twitter, why is it one of the "unofficial sources"?

      And Qunow, I think maybe you should put Ibuki back into Future Updates until Unofficial Sources are ready to open as an individual page. The Kii and Owari stuff beneath Ibuki uses the same source (kannkolle sokuhou) as the latter, so removing it makes Kii's description kinda weird, as it looks like Kii was mentioned in Shinano's official twitter post.

        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote:
      ===ShinanoEdit===
      • Status: No signs of happening yet
      • Source: Official Twitter
      • Source Date: October 2013

      Well, I really have to ask again, if it's from "official" twitter, why is it one of the "unofficial sources"?

      And Qunow, I think maybe you should put Ibuki back into Future Updates until Unofficial Sources are ready to open as an individual page. The Kii and Owari stuff beneath Ibuki uses the same source (kannkolle sokuhou) as the latter, so removing it makes Kii's description kinda weird, as it looks like Kii was mentioned in Shinano's official twitter post.

      maybe its because Unofficial Sources isnt a fixed name yet?

        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote:

      ShinanoEdit

      • Status: No signs of happening yet
      • Source: Official Twitter
      • Source Date: October 2013

      Well, I really have to ask again, if it's from "official" twitter, why is it one of the "unofficial sources"?

      And Qunow, I think maybe you should put Ibuki back into Future Updates until Unofficial Sources are ready to open as an individual page. The Kii and Owari stuff beneath Ibuki uses the same source (kannkolle sokuhou) as the latter, so removing it makes Kii's description kinda weird, as it looks like Kii was mentioned in Shinano's official twitter post.

      1. I still don't have time to review cobtent of the page yet and thus the large red text on top of the drafred page. I do not have the time to review those new addition in the recent updates page either.
      2. kancolle shoukuhou is not the original source for them.
      3. Please help removing that too.
        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote: Well, I really have to ask again, if it's from "official" twitter, why is it one of the "unofficial sources"?

      As specifically mentioned on the main post, fourth paragraph:

      However, we think this is not the best title for the article, for these are not totally unofficial, and also not totally official. Sometimes, there are even official tweets that fall under this, such as Shinano hints.

        Loading editor
    • Alright, I see that Kii and Owari has been removed from Recent Updates as well, can I add them to Unofficial Sources (temporary name)? I'll continue on looking for intels about hinted new ships/ K2s/ etc. and surely I can use a place to put them.

        Loading editor
    • is there any reason Kii and Owari would be Kai-Yamato, or A-150 class? They were fBBs based on [ultimately] the Nagato-class...

        Loading editor
    • Vcharng wrote: Alright, I see that Kii and Owari has been removed from Recent Updates as well, can I add them to Unofficial Sources (temporary name)? I'll continue on looking for intels about hinted new ships/ K2s/ etc. and surely I can use a place to put them.

      The problem is that, do you think what Tanaka said on this page constitue as plan. Which I don't think so.


      btw, someone once made a site that collected all the things Tanaka have said and done, but is apparently offline. The google-cached mainpage of the site is archived at here.

        Loading editor
    • Qunow wrote:

      Vcharng wrote: Alright, I see that Kii and Owari has been removed from Recent Updates as well, can I add them to Unofficial Sources (temporary name)? I'll continue on looking for intels about hinted new ships/ K2s/ etc. and surely I can use a place to put them.

      The problem is that, do you think what Tanaka said on this page constitue as plan. Which I don't think so.


      btw, someone once made a site that collected all the things Tanaka have said and done, but is apparently offline. The google-cached mainpage of the site is archived at here.

      Remember, this is the second time Tanaka mentioned Kii-class, the first time was here, where he actually said "Planning to introduce":

      http://www.4gamer.net/games/205/G020591/20130911062/

      What can't be counted as a plan is the "46cm plan vs. 51cm" plan, Kii-class itself (and its 5th slot) sure is a plan.


      (Maybe someone would challenge that Tanaka only said "5th slot planned to be implemented on Kii class", but come on, if Kii-class don't exist first, how are you gonna plan something to be implemented on it?)

        Loading editor
    • Then the source should be this interview instead

        Loading editor
    • Qunow wrote:
      Then the source should be this interview instead

      Well, I was going to put on both. Two sources are better than one, you know. But alright, I'll use the 4games page as the main source, while mentioning the 46cm vs 51 cm stuff in the description.

        Loading editor
    • Swordweaver wrote:
      is there any reason Kii and Owari would be Kai-Yamato, or A-150 class? They were fBBs based on [ultimately] the Nagato-class...

      We are talking about different Kii-classes.

      The first Kii-class is what you mentioned, part of 88 fleet plan. The second Kii-class is the planned name for Super Yamato (Not for Kai-Yamato) class.

      In Japan it's very common to use "Kii-class" to refer to the Super Yamato. Especially on novels, games and mangas that presumes the plan to come true. For example the old PC game series "Teitoku no Ketsudan" (提督の決断, known as Pacific Theater of Operation when its PS2 counterpart was released in US). BTW, the game uses "Owari-class" to refer to the old Kii-class.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks all for the feedback, the page is now renamed to Hinted Content. Any other suggestion to the article, or any related discussion, please post it on its comments section.

        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.