Loading editor
  • Actually I am losing interest in the game, you may understand if you know what happened in the Japanese community these days... Totally nonsense but I am really afraid of what would happen next.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi SpFire!

    Thanks again for sharing some interesting data with me during Winter 2018.  I've been slacking off after the event but today I finally got around to edit my blog =.=

    I've added a new "Base Defense" section citing your test data, I'd appreaciate if you can let me know if there's anything you disagree/wish to add.  No rush of course, take your time :)


      Loading editor
    • Hi TenkouKuugen,

      I will carefully check your blog later, when I have enough time. What I can say at present is that we have to clarify our term what actually "Interceptor" refers to. Shouldn't we use "Land-based Fighters" instead? There are some airplanes appropriate for interception among 局戦 and 陸戦 but neither of them are designed for interception.

        Loading editor
    • Heya! I very briefly touched on the difference between Interceptors and Army Fighters (in an earlier Section) and I intend to keep it simple.  My blog is aimed for beginners so I want them to get started on land based planes asap (rather than believing that carrier based fighters will last them forever).

      Tanaka probably had Raiden in mind when he introduced the dark green icon (and Hayabusa for the light green), but I don't intend to go deeper into militarily-correct terminologies in this particular blog.  I'm happy as long as they're aware of the different icons in game and what they mean heh (and later direct their attention to anti-bomber stats).  I'd avoid putting information on hold for the sake of terminologies (you may or may not be aware that the Kaiboukan classification almost pulled wikia apart).

      Editing public pages, unfortunately, isn't so simple =.=

        Loading editor
    • Well, it seems that I have missed the earlier section of your article...

      At present, I still think it is better to explain 局戦 and 陸戦 together, as Land-based fighters (or Interceptors, as you like). It is a pity that the "rumour" has spread that the former has better bonus than the latter, but, in fact, there has not been strong evidence for this claim. 

      The avoidance of the use of "Interceptor", suggested by me, is not from militarily-correct point of view but rather a practical point of view, as it is counterintuitive that some "Interceptors" are not fully advisable to use for interception. But I do not want to involve some unnecessary argument like the Kaiboukan issue...

      In How Base Defense Works section, You wrote:

      >Recall the Aerial Combat table: you may shoot down 0-100% enemy planes by achieving AS+, 0-80% for AS, 0-60% for AP and so on. Notice once again that the shotdown % is subjective to RNG, ie you'll have good and bad rolls. Having a better Air Control state sets you up for a better starting position.

      It is quite sure that the shot-down-ratio range differs from that of Aerial Combat, so it is probably better to omit the reference to it (and also particular ranges). In fact, I have proposed a hypothetical formulae (, which requires further investigation but may return approximate results. But it may not for beginners... 

      In Interceptors Shoot Down More

      >No formulae were proposed in these studies, but judging from the data I'd guess that each anti-bomb stat contributes to something like 1.5% bonus shotdown.

      I think it is better to omit the figure 1.5%, as the exact shotdown bonus is a bit complicated (not for beginners). Unfortunately, I am not a student of Statistics so I cannot underline my own hypothesis very strongly... but you can find my data and report concerning the Anti-bomb bonus in #strategy.

        Loading editor
    • Oh I wish I saw that proposed info 0.0

      I had a crude formular in mind when updating the blog, ie Shotdown % = Air Control Base % + "Interceptor" Bonus % 

      That proposal of yours is a lot more sophisticated and promising.  I always wondered why my base can still achieve something like 80% shotdown (AS) on a bad day.  I'll have to have a closer look when I have time :)

      Thanks for the feedbacks, seems like I misunderstood the context of your 1st reply.  I'll take your suggestions into consideration in the next update.  Please keep sharing delicious info in the future too \o/

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Good day fellow Admiral! Welcome to KanColle Wiki!

    Thank you for your edit to the User blog:TenkouKuugen/LBAS - Take Care of Your Fairies page. We're glad to see a new contributor to our wikia.

    If you are a new player, you may want to read up on the tutorials to get you started:

    If you are an experienced admiral and have just started contributing to the wikia, you may find some of these editing resources useful: Contributing, Help, Templates.

    If you have any other concerns, you may comment on the respective page involved, or post a new thread on the wiki forum, or join us on chat! For issues involving special wikia privilege, you may contact any of the staff for help.

    Thank you and have a good sortie run!

    ( This is an automated message )

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.