2,980
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Tennousu
0
<div class="quote"><i>Saumarez wrote:
Forgive my possible ignorance here but what good does buffing carrier firepower stat do?</i></div>
<p>The same as buffing everyone's firepower. </p><p>Even more so, because every point in firepower means 1.5 more shelling power, unlike everyone else. </p>
Forgive my possible ignorance here but what good does buffing carrier firepower stat do?</i></div>
<p>The same as buffing everyone's firepower. </p><p>Even more so, because every point in firepower means 1.5 more shelling power, unlike everyone else. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>Fredericcc wrote:
<p>Well to be honest...Yuugumos are good ships when it comes to surfance combat. The only problem is that remodeling is way too expensive. One action report plus one blueprint just to remodel a DD aint no joke!
</p>
</i></div>
<p>You need to take 12.7cm Model D Kai 2 into account, because making that one costs more than a single blueprint. </p><p>Although remodeling Asashimo to Kai Ni IS expensive due to that bullshit devmats cost. </p>
<p>You need to take 12.7cm Model D Kai 2 into account, because making that one costs more than a single blueprint. </p><p>Although remodeling Asashimo to Kai Ni IS expensive due to that bullshit devmats cost. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
1
<p>2 Toukai or less in your hand -> Pick Toukai. Nothing else matters.
</p>
<hr><p>My own opinion is basically this:
</p><p>3 Toukai -> NOW you think.
</p><p>4th Toukai is okay.
</p><p>The improvement of M34 increases its damage and +AA. +AA is good, but honestly unless you min-maxing your airfield to the extreme degree or lack bullshit land-based fighters like Hayabusa (64th), you don't really need one. Increased damage is good, but airstrike is still too random, enemy AA defense is a thing, and it's base power is only 1 torpedo point higher than the vanilla Type 1 LB Attacker.
</p><p>(disclaimer: although there ARE benefits in having LB Attackers with higher +AA. I'm one of those who like min-maxing my airfield whenever possible).
</p><p>14cm Twin Kai is....your love for Nisshin must transcend even the boundaries of the world to justify picking this.
</p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<p>What the flying fuck, did they just downgrade the e-peen level of Nonaka Squadron by giving it on ranking?
</p><p>...oh well. *whisk away*
</p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>TTK Mull - S-204 wrote:
<p>Looks like I can pick the Toukai from quest F81 now. I never knew if I rather should take the Raiden, but with the Reppuu Kai from last event and one of those new rocket fighters, the Toukai seems better. Two bomber-sweepers should be enough, or do I really need the Raiden too? I don't have a Toukai yet, only a T97 (931) and a T0 Mod 11B (skilled) for anti-sub patrol.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Toukai. </p><p>(Almost) No contest. </p>
<p>Toukai. </p><p>(Almost) No contest. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<p>Oh hey, Zoro's missing sword.
</p><p>That anti-bomber stat sure is something.
</p><p>Kinda sad about the plane that surpass the Metal Gear though, even if it's still strong.
</p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>Admiral Hide wrote:
It means, whatever fancy features we can think of that other games may or may not have for sale, Tanaker gang would have to do it <i>for free.</i></i></div>
<p>Not increased min slot. </p><p>Never increased min slot. </p>
<p>Not increased min slot. </p><p>Never increased min slot. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>Yoyoyo5678 wrote:
<p>
so which expeditions should I pick? (I wants more buckets and bux) </p> </i></div>
<p>Expedition #41. Better be friends with it. </p>
so which expeditions should I pick? (I wants more buckets and bux) </p> </i></div>
<p>Expedition #41. Better be friends with it. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>Yoyoyo5678 wrote:
-snip-</i></div>
<p>Are you new-ish? You can gain more by not staying above your resource soft-cap (see in HQ Screen) rather than stockpiling high. Buckets are another story though. </p><p>Most of the trouble in 1-5 comes from being high HQ but lacking ships with preemptive anti-sub attacks, as well as bullshit torpedo accuracy. Isuzu and Naka Kai Ni can significantly reduce the burden. Naka needs Lv. 60 as well as 3x Type 3 Active Sonars, but its well worth it. </p><p>2-5 and 3-5 demands a lot more. And not cheap on buckets either. You can alleviate this with sortieing there once or twice a day, then spend the rest of the day for repairing. </p>
<p>Are you new-ish? You can gain more by not staying above your resource soft-cap (see in HQ Screen) rather than stockpiling high. Buckets are another story though. </p><p>Most of the trouble in 1-5 comes from being high HQ but lacking ships with preemptive anti-sub attacks, as well as bullshit torpedo accuracy. Isuzu and Naka Kai Ni can significantly reduce the burden. Naka needs Lv. 60 as well as 3x Type 3 Active Sonars, but its well worth it. </p><p>2-5 and 3-5 demands a lot more. And not cheap on buckets either. You can alleviate this with sortieing there once or twice a day, then spend the rest of the day for repairing. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>DC23A wrote:
<p>This sort of gear in EX would be too OP, but I like the idea of bonuses with other equipment, seeing as how they just keep buffing Boss armours. Main Guns + T4 Rocket Launcher bonus would be nice because then you can use it with a T9 or a Sanshiki on Battleships; sacrificing Artillery Spotting on 4 slot BBs.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>I got a crazy idea that Tanaka will never do. </p><p>- Allows mortars and AG rockets to be used as main gun substitute against installations and only installations. </p><p>- This means they'll need two of mortars/AG rockets to deal nighttime double-tap with increased damage bonus vs. installation only. Bonus depends on the mortar/AG rockets equipment setup (separate from existing anti-installation bonus). </p><p>- Normal gun + mortar/AG rocket is also a fair game, less damage bonus ofc. </p>
<p>I got a crazy idea that Tanaka will never do. </p><p>- Allows mortars and AG rockets to be used as main gun substitute against installations and only installations. </p><p>- This means they'll need two of mortars/AG rockets to deal nighttime double-tap with increased damage bonus vs. installation only. Bonus depends on the mortar/AG rockets equipment setup (separate from existing anti-installation bonus). </p><p>- Normal gun + mortar/AG rocket is also a fair game, less damage bonus ofc. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>DC23A wrote:
Or make people drool over them even more if they synergise with the Tankhatsu + KaMi Tank + WG42 combo. If the T4 Rocket Launcher adds a further multiplier to that damage calculation, we are going to see obscene numbers against Installation bosses from four-slot ships that can carry all of them, especially when incorporated into one of the Touch type special attacks.</i></div>
<p>That only happens if the multiplier exceeds 2nd WG42 bonus, 11th Tank Regiment's, or if it's just pre-cap like usual. </p><p>The way they could make it more desireable is if they let them be in EX-slot, or perform -something else- apart from increasing damage. </p>
<p>That only happens if the multiplier exceeds 2nd WG42 bonus, 11th Tank Regiment's, or if it's just pre-cap like usual. </p><p>The way they could make it more desireable is if they let them be in EX-slot, or perform -something else- apart from increasing damage. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>DC23A wrote:
Meanwhile WG42s still aren't craftable and U-511 hasn't been a drop in years. </p><p>[...], then I sincerely hope there will be a few WG42 quest or early map rewards during the event. </p> </i></div>
<p>On the contrary, I think this is how they're gonna phase WG42 from everyone's memory. </p><p>Mortards and AG Rockets as rewards are more likely. </p>
Meanwhile WG42s still aren't craftable and U-511 hasn't been a drop in years. </p><p>[...], then I sincerely hope there will be a few WG42 quest or early map rewards during the event. </p> </i></div>
<p>On the contrary, I think this is how they're gonna phase WG42 from everyone's memory. </p><p>Mortards and AG Rockets as rewards are more likely. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>Ekel wrote:
Actually, that might be pretty neat combination. Instead of choosing between Wurfgerat for boss or OASW gear for pre-boss you can just equip one of those (as long as DD has innate ASW or sonar equipped). I wonder what multipliers/synergies they have.</i></div>
<p>Until they messed up with the code. </p>
Actually, that might be pretty neat combination. Instead of choosing between Wurfgerat for boss or OASW gear for pre-boss you can just equip one of those (as long as DD has innate ASW or sonar equipped). I wonder what multipliers/synergies they have.</i></div>
<p>Until they messed up with the code. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>FogRepairShipAkashi wrote:<div class="quote">Tennousu wrote:
Is Expedition #41 their way of saying fuck you to those who don't keep any Kaiboukan. <p>I hope an alternate requirement exist. </p> </i></div>
DEs aren't required. </div> <p>Waaaait, but there are icons that indicates Kaiboukan though (it's smaller than DD's icon)? </p>
Is Expedition #41 their way of saying fuck you to those who don't keep any Kaiboukan. <p>I hope an alternate requirement exist. </p> </i></div>
DEs aren't required. </div> <p>Waaaait, but there are icons that indicates Kaiboukan though (it's smaller than DD's icon)? </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<div class="quote"><i>AnimeFreak40K wrote:
<p>There are already a fair number of quests that have done pretty much exactly that. Why would this be any different?
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Because it blocks an easy bucket + devmat source (I'm starved for the latter), and it cockblocks another chain of expeditions that can be done lazily. </p><p>No, A2 sucks as a devmat mines. </p><p>And there is only one quest that needs Kaiboukan. The quest before that quest gives you exactly one. And that one is what I have, waiting for one more to be feed to someone else. </p>
<p>Because it blocks an easy bucket + devmat source (I'm starved for the latter), and it cockblocks another chain of expeditions that can be done lazily. </p><p>No, A2 sucks as a devmat mines. </p><p>And there is only one quest that needs Kaiboukan. The quest before that quest gives you exactly one. And that one is what I have, waiting for one more to be feed to someone else. </p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<p>Is Expedition #41 their way of saying fuck you to those who don't keep any Kaiboukan.
</p><p>I hope an alternate requirement exist.
</p>
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
(Edited by Tennousu)
0
<p>Send bauxite and devmats to me pl0x.
</p><p>I need about 260 devmats, of which 160 is for Fletcher and John remodel, and instantly becomes one of the top BS things I experienced in 2nd Seq.
</p><p>(doesn't help that A2 gives zilch most of the time)
</p><p>To think I'm late to realise that there are no easy expedition for devmats unlike buckets.
</p><p>edit:
</p><p>The daily + 2 weekly scrapping quests are easier if you take passive resource regeneration into account, but sitting on <30k doesn't sit well with some people.
</p>
(Edited by Tennousu)