To prevent ruining people's "fun". There will be a 3 days grace upon release of a new episode to prevent possible spoilers in the live chat room. You are still free to discuss anything here.
(Edited by administrators)
2,980
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by TheLenrir
<div class="quote"><i>Zephyrast wrote:
<div class="quote"> <p>TheLenrir wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Shinhwalee wrote:
Challenge Accepted, never gave up till the end and I cleared all Hard despite everyone telling me to just switch to easy. <p>RNG is one of the reason why I do Events. </p> </i></div>
fixed </div>Do enough runs and RNG will cave. Proper preparation is how you win events. </div> <p>
</p><p>Tell Mikado that. </p>
<div class="quote"> <p>TheLenrir wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Shinhwalee wrote:
Challenge Accepted, never gave up till the end and I cleared all Hard despite everyone telling me to just switch to easy. <p>RNG is one of the reason why I do Events. </p> </i></div>
fixed </div>Do enough runs and RNG will cave. Proper preparation is how you win events. </div> <p>
</p><p>Tell Mikado that. </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<div class="quote"><i>Shinhwalee wrote:
Challenge Accepted, never gave up till the end and I cleared all Hard despite everyone telling me to just switch to easy. <p>RNG is one of the reason why I do Events. </p> </i></div>
<p>fixed </p>
Challenge Accepted, never gave up till the end and I cleared all Hard despite everyone telling me to just switch to easy. <p>RNG is one of the reason why I do Events. </p> </i></div>
<p>fixed </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
Highlighted this since I felt this is something that people can get behind. It's not often we get someone on our shores doing something like this so I figured it would only be right to give it a thumbs up.
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<div class="quote"><i>SonyaUliana wrote:
<div class="quote">TheLenrir wrote: <p>
It's a fucking Hypothetical Ship for christ's sake. We shouldn't allow a 'fictional' ship to suddenly cause us to rebrand Taihou. </p> </i></div>
Doesn't matter, since the issue of "CVB vs new designation" is for their assignment to Kancolle, not to real life history. The designation is to allow us to specifically refer to a particular ship class with unique ingame mechanics from other carriers. If we were to go with real life Taihou would simply be a "CV", and yet because this is Kancolle where Taihou has a unique ability the classification is required for ease of identification. <p>And while Shoukaku is hypothetical, ingame she now also has a form that has the same ability as Taihou, thus her designation along with Taihou's is also important now, in fact even more so given that Taihou can no longer claim to be unique to her class, and therefore her designation should be capable of encompassing the other carriers that share her ability. </p> </div> <p>So put Shoukaku Kai ni as a CVB then, how fucking hard can that possibly be? Yet everyone here is sperging about 'OH WE SHOULD MAKE THEM SEPERATE' </p>
<div class="quote">TheLenrir wrote: <p>
It's a fucking Hypothetical Ship for christ's sake. We shouldn't allow a 'fictional' ship to suddenly cause us to rebrand Taihou. </p> </i></div>
Doesn't matter, since the issue of "CVB vs new designation" is for their assignment to Kancolle, not to real life history. The designation is to allow us to specifically refer to a particular ship class with unique ingame mechanics from other carriers. If we were to go with real life Taihou would simply be a "CV", and yet because this is Kancolle where Taihou has a unique ability the classification is required for ease of identification. <p>And while Shoukaku is hypothetical, ingame she now also has a form that has the same ability as Taihou, thus her designation along with Taihou's is also important now, in fact even more so given that Taihou can no longer claim to be unique to her class, and therefore her designation should be capable of encompassing the other carriers that share her ability. </p> </div> <p>So put Shoukaku Kai ni as a CVB then, how fucking hard can that possibly be? Yet everyone here is sperging about 'OH WE SHOULD MAKE THEM SEPERATE' </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<div class="quote"><i>SonyaUliana wrote:
<div class="quote">TheLenrir wrote:
<p>It's been over a year since Taihou has been released and now people are suddenly branding their pitchforks about the ship term. Why now? Why not earlier? Why do it when the term has been so established into the annals of Kancolle history that it would inevitably lead to bickering which is being displayed in some parts of this discussion? </p> </i></div>
<p>While the topic is about Taihou, this discussion actually came about due to Shoukaku Kai Ni and her Kai Ni Kou form. Shoukaku's upgrades giving her the same ability as Taihou means that Taihou can no longer claim to be unique, which thus necessitates having a classification to the type of carrier that Taihou and Shoukaku are. Hell, given Shoukaku's upgrades it's likely that Zuikaku will follow suit, which means we'll have three armored carriers that thus demand their own proper classification. </p> </div> <p>
</p><p>It's a fucking Hypothetical Ship for christ's sake. We shouldn't allow a 'fictional' ship to suddenly cause us to rebrand Taihou. </p>
<div class="quote">TheLenrir wrote:
<p>It's been over a year since Taihou has been released and now people are suddenly branding their pitchforks about the ship term. Why now? Why not earlier? Why do it when the term has been so established into the annals of Kancolle history that it would inevitably lead to bickering which is being displayed in some parts of this discussion? </p> </i></div>
<p>While the topic is about Taihou, this discussion actually came about due to Shoukaku Kai Ni and her Kai Ni Kou form. Shoukaku's upgrades giving her the same ability as Taihou means that Taihou can no longer claim to be unique, which thus necessitates having a classification to the type of carrier that Taihou and Shoukaku are. Hell, given Shoukaku's upgrades it's likely that Zuikaku will follow suit, which means we'll have three armored carriers that thus demand their own proper classification. </p> </div> <p>
</p><p>It's a fucking Hypothetical Ship for christ's sake. We shouldn't allow a 'fictional' ship to suddenly cause us to rebrand Taihou. </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<div class="quote"><i>Ether Real wrote:
<div class="quote"> TheLenrir wrote: <figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">This entire fucking thread</p> </figcaption></figure>This is why I dislike event downtime, we 'decide' to discuss about things which ultimately has no importance to anything.
</i></div>
one does not simply approve without thinking creatively... <p>We already got T that shared both Training and Torpedo, why can't Heavy and Armored share an <i>A</i> ? As we use it, it should become commonly known, or do we need to discover a new, sounds cool, maybe suitable much hull code? Please make it simple, and poll where? </p> </div> <p>Because trying to generate a Civilised Debate on stuff like this is always going to devolve into tumbler-esque, toy throwing, degenerate arguments. You got one side who is like 'I prefer the term as we have dealt with this for a long time, then another which is like 'well it should change', but this branches into various 'factions' which can not agree on a term, while imparting their 'armchair' historical knowledge on why X is Y. </p><p>
</p><p>It's been over a year since Taihou has been released and now people are suddenly brandishing their pitchforks about the ship term. Why now? Why not earlier? Why do it when the term has been so established into the annals of Kancolle history that it would inevitably lead to bickering which is being displayed in some parts of this discussion? </p><p>
</p><p>Like I told other folks, I prefer to keep the status quo when it comes to stuff like this as I found, from personal experience, that it never leads to a good ending. </p><p>
</p><p>Edit: thanks to Fuji for spellchecking/grammar checking this, I fail at English as an Englishman, the sadness is real. </p>
<div class="quote"> TheLenrir wrote: <figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">This entire fucking thread</p> </figcaption></figure>This is why I dislike event downtime, we 'decide' to discuss about things which ultimately has no importance to anything.
</i></div>one does not simply approve without thinking creatively... <p>We already got T that shared both Training and Torpedo, why can't Heavy and Armored share an <i>A</i> ? As we use it, it should become commonly known, or do we need to discover a new, sounds cool, maybe suitable much hull code? Please make it simple, and poll where? </p> </div> <p>Because trying to generate a Civilised Debate on stuff like this is always going to devolve into tumbler-esque, toy throwing, degenerate arguments. You got one side who is like 'I prefer the term as we have dealt with this for a long time, then another which is like 'well it should change', but this branches into various 'factions' which can not agree on a term, while imparting their 'armchair' historical knowledge on why X is Y. </p><p>
</p><p>It's been over a year since Taihou has been released and now people are suddenly brandishing their pitchforks about the ship term. Why now? Why not earlier? Why do it when the term has been so established into the annals of Kancolle history that it would inevitably lead to bickering which is being displayed in some parts of this discussion? </p><p>
</p><p>Like I told other folks, I prefer to keep the status quo when it comes to stuff like this as I found, from personal experience, that it never leads to a good ending. </p><p>
</p><p>Edit: thanks to Fuji for spellchecking/grammar checking this, I fail at English as an Englishman, the sadness is real. </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
10
<p>It should be called NBC clearly. What does it stand for? You can probably take a guess.
</p><p>
</p><p>Edit: </p><p>NBC = NoBody Cares Carrier </p>
</p><p>Edit: </p><p>NBC = NoBody Cares Carrier </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<div class="quote"><i>Admiral Mikado wrote:
<p>Note: I take no responsibility for getting some or all the details wrong, so don't bother shitting on me. </p> </i></div>
<p>
</p><p>Not sure if there is anyone out there who would bend over your body and take a shit on you. </p>
<p>Note: I take no responsibility for getting some or all the details wrong, so don't bother shitting on me. </p> </i></div>
<p>
</p><p>Not sure if there is anyone out there who would bend over your body and take a shit on you. </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
(Edited by TheLenrir)
(Edited by TheLenrir)
All of this because I came up with a stupid idea with Fuji about using Subs to cheese the anchorage :V
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<p>It's amazing how they do this without consulting others. Considering how many of us use dynamic IP's, it's pretty fucking stupid to just ban a whole range of IP address ranges that 'look' bad. Fortunately I have some software that allows me to swap and switch my IP but it's getting pretty old fast to switch to yet another IP after they destroy one just because some douchenozzle wrote 'lmao' which counts as 'vandalism'.
</p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<p>I'm against the AnonIP purely out of principle. It is up to the user himself whether he wishes to register and give himself a 'handle' so to speak or to continue being 'dat' anon guy. I am aware that, should a person really want to, they can track their ip and so forth but odds are (good odds) it is an IP which proabably and likely changes every time upon connection.
</p><p>It doesn't matter though, everyone wants it and I am only just one guy.
</p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<div class="quote"><i>Gensui Hime wrote:
Being able to see Anon IP addresses will definitely help in tracking users and fixing pages/handing out warnings to vandals, nice work! Your projects are outstanding, hope to see more as time passes!</i></div>
<p>
</p><p>Can we please get this 'delusion' out of our heads that it will help out with vandals? Any idiot worth their salt is using a dynamic IP anyway. </p>
Being able to see Anon IP addresses will definitely help in tracking users and fixing pages/handing out warnings to vandals, nice work! Your projects are outstanding, hope to see more as time passes!</i></div>
<p>
</p><p>Can we please get this 'delusion' out of our heads that it will help out with vandals? Any idiot worth their salt is using a dynamic IP anyway. </p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)
<p>praise <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px;line-height:18.2000007629395px;white-space:pre-line;">_(:3」∠)_</span>
</p>
(Edited by TheLenrir)