Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26091970-20150604000724/@comment-26410405-20150926165625

42.60.228.10 wrote:

^"I hope you don't mean vote on BB designations, because there's really nothing to vote about there."

It probably will because the discussion derailed to this extent. But again, moving on. In that case you should start a separate topic. But really, you want to separate BB into different subclasses, which historically wasn't the case with US Navy as they all been classified as BB, but you want to keep all standart carriers regardless of their size, having armored deck and function classified as CV which is the direct opposite? You'll earn the ire of the many "Hull Classification Supremacists", as 202.166.14.133 politely called them, on this page.