Board Thread:Wikia Discussion/@comment-25683568-20150318062713/@comment-25351051-20150406111516

That is true. I didn't look at the original name for autogyro :P

When I say "Type", I refer to the fact that it's a fighter. Model 52 in this sense would be an attribute, and not a model. Sorry for the ambiguity.
 * For that 零式艦戦52型:The model is "Type 0"; The Type is "Fighter Plane"; The attribute is "Model 52"
 * Attribute refers to additional information that applies to the object. *edited into the explanation above*

However, regarding the Autogyro: it is カ号 and neither カ式 or カ型, therefore it'd be misleading to translate that into Ka Type. For consistency, the word Type should be reserved for only translations of>式 and型.号refers to number, and I think a different word should be though up to translate it... maybe class? "Ka-class Autogyro" sounds good in my opinion.
 * I think:型 = class or model.式 = model or type. 号 = class or number, but definitely not type, for lack of better wording at the moment.

With the RADAR and SONAR, since they're already capitalized in the pages, I don't see why we should change it, regardless of what Wikipedia says.