Board Thread:Event Community Discussion/@comment-25730832-20170511175819/@comment-1637496-20170512033230

Hasemiru wrote: In the second document you state there's some contradiction going on since they mention the Mikura-class and Ukuru-class as Patrol Frigates, but mention after them Kaiboukan N°1 class and N°2 class (Type C and Type D Kaiboukan respectively). This means that even US Naval Intelligence wasn't able to put them under a unified standard as the Japanese had.

This makes the an already complex theme more comlplex.

I'm going to have to agree with Zel-melon and Tsubakura, and stick with just creating our own tag and designating them as escort ships. Like they say in spanish: "¡...y punto!" Using kaibokan in place of patrol frigate doesn't appear like a contradiction to me, it's not an abbreviation, which is the point of the discussion here. Anyway in ONI-222 No.1 is referred to as PF.

Dandan550 wrote:

I assure that is after the war report heh. Not following to that. Not following to what?