Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25730832-20160122165904/@comment-26825520-20160124094739

KuroPercher wrote: 5.189.18.240 wrote: Vcharng wrote: 5.189.18.240 wrote: Playing all previous events which were poining to Solomon Islands battles or operations like "Hailstone" like NOT an Axis operation... seems legit. You have one more try boy. The bosses you fought against are Japanese ships, period.

If you insist that you are playing as Axis power, you may as well retire now. Actually you should have done so in AL/MI, where bosses clearly modeled after IJN ships first appeared. Just tell me boy. How do you fell if you will have in the same fleet CV Kaga and CV Enterprise (which sunk Kaga), BB Kongou and SS Sealion (which sunk Kongou), Kirishima with South Dakota and Washington and so on.....

Just tell me if you OK with this. YES or NO? So you dont have Inazuma in the same fleet with Miyuki ? Or Maikaze and Akagi, or Hagikaze and Kaga? And many more IJN ship that got scuttle by their allies.

And FYI, i'm OKAY with it. Kancolle is not WW2 Those two are different situations.

Miyuki and Inazuma is an accident. Which both fears still fearing each other. Same as Hatsukaze and Myoukou; Hatsukaze respects Myoukou-nee, but still very much fears her.

Maikaze and Akagi/Hagikaze and Kaga's scuttling is more of a forced-to situation--- they had to scuttle them. You could also think of this as putting them out of their misery.

IJN and USN will be iffy, because USN had full intentions to sink IJN ships.

So yeah 2 different situations. I'm not okay with them.