Talk:Combat/@comment-25247727-20140731071812/@comment-24928130-20140731092517

If there was a clear penalty for stacking big guns, a level 1 Kongou-class stacking 3x46cm would still show arguably more realistic results than a lvl99 Kongou-class with pretty much maxed out accuracy stats. (Funnily enough, stacking 3x46cm seemed like the worse performing setup according to the results.)

These test results aren't very helpful cause the accuracy stats isn't as quantifiable as the others. We don't even know what the baseline for it is (forget that all of this is already at the mercy of RNG), just a few stats here and there from equipment. Even if you want to go the statistical analysis route, doing it on 1-1 to get a normalized value doesn't mean much without known accuracy values to gauge progress. In the end, the results will tell us which setup begins to fail at which threshold (enemy-type, lvl, etc...).

Yes, if you want to be all proper about it and start from the lowest and work your way up, be my guest, but I think it's much more productive (now) to do these test against enemies that are actually of concern. Since the event is coming up, that'll be pretty much all flagship level enemies (and elites if you want). I'm not knocking on what the guy is doing here and I realise that it's much harder and time-consuming to run this for higher level mobs. It's just that I think the priorities are backwards here.