Talk:Expedition/Reference tables/@comment-25730832-20150228041654/@comment-25730832-20150228061933

What I think is that people learn things in different way (that's positive thinking right there, otherwise I"ll just say they're lazy). Some people can understand it with just text reading while some will learn faster/better through some examples.That's why I can't agree with the anon that said "it's their own fault" 100%.

And since this is a new table with a whole new way of working through it, it will definitely take a while before people get used to it. It's like a new worker, you can't just throw him into the workplace and expect him to be able to work that machine in front of him correctly on his first try.

Like how most textbooks will have an example section that provides additional aid to the reader. Although, I'm not a fan of multiple examples myself because that usually limit people's capability of thinking on their own by relying on making it similar to the example question. But as you all said, it can't be examples for everything otherwise it'll just be an answer.

Examples can be provided for people who are willing to read/look since it will help them understand. That still won't prevent people from skimming through it which will usually end up with them asking some question that will inevitably get a bash from the peaceful internet community.

@Kenji I would have to oppose your suggestion on moving/duplicating the whole conditions of class composition here as it doesn't seem necessary to repeat what was already written unless it's in an example. I do not know if it will be a problem in the future yet and if I have a solution for it.