Talk:List of destroyers by upgraded maximum stats/@comment-5032812-20150716012510/@comment-202.166.14.133-20150723065905

And congratulations to you too for being unable to take criticism. That's the problem with you mid-level TTKs who think you're hot stuff. You take all criticism/challenges personally and can't accept that you're still not good enough to be a veteran yet (Seriously, be patient about that kind of stuff and open-minded to people who call you out on your wrongs)

Anyway, Is it wrong to want a little quality control over assessments? Especially in a wiki which is meant to give factual information instead of "theorycrafting" with no practical value. Like you said, you don't have Akizuki and you still think you're qualified to give an impartial overall assessment of all of the Destroyers? (I'm getting an "information-giving" tone rather than a "clarification" tone in your statements)