Talk:Partials/Blueprint Priority/@comment-122.150.237.85-20170313082047

Sometimes, I dislike this sort of analysis / priority lists. The most important factor is when a need for particular abilities arises, namely the events in the case of Kancolle.

Its fine and all to put in a disclaimer states that priorities can change based on individual circumstances. However, tiering things has a tendency to make people jump at making premature decisions rather making a well thought out choice.

Another thing is that a ordered 'priorities' analysis is influenced by the experience of the veteran admiral. I have been given different opinions even from admirals who have never failed to get an event e-peen medal.

I believe it would be better to remove the tiers and display the information in a table. The coloumns could state the primary advantages (stats / abilities), other requirements (lvl / catapult), items provided, access to quests.

One horrible piece I received on the wiki and other players recieve on reddit was to just BP Abukuma with the 1st BP available. I started playing KC 7-8 weeks before Spring 2017 and giving Abukuma my only BP would have been a horrible choice even with 5 Combined fleet maps (1 STF, 1 TF, 3 CTF)