Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26091970-20150604000724/@comment-115.77.219.254-20150926165736

Archer88 wrote: 115.77.219.254 wrote:

If size or displacement don't matter, so we don't need seperate Light Cruiser, Heavy Cruiser or Battlercruiser either, just Cruiser for all of them, because their role are "cruisers". When you are using USN hull code for CV, BBV and other stuff, you must follow it standard, and don't smiple say "don't care because this is Japanese game", you can create new one when USN hull code don't has, but can't just misuse or overlap the code, as same as using meteric/imperial units but using in your own way and say "I don't care, I'm not French or British either. While USN hull code care more size and displacement than armoured or unarmoured, because that just upgrade for ship, those upgrade don't chage role of the ship or size, displacement. You again? I already made it clear that I only have my swords to give you now, as there's nothing I can convince you with. And you misunderstood my statement, because I meant that there's no difference between how ships of different sizes of the same class act in game. Armored Carrier Taihou has the ability to launch planes while at "chuuha", while the to be implemented Armored Carrier Shinano would have the very same ability. Also, there are no battlecruisers in this game, yet.

Enough of this pointless discussion, lets just vote already. That kind of upgrade don't make them become complete new class, like give 8" gun don't make Light Cruiser become Heavy Cruiser, size and displacement is matter. Because with displacement and size of Shinano, it can carry and launch twin-engine heavy fighter or medium bombers with ease, while other carrier have trouble with twin engine planes.

And so, if no difference between how ships of different size of class, why should divide light cruiser and heavy since they're all cruiser. Just all Cruiser for them?

And your sword is toy sword, it won't effect, lolz.