Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-3502824-20180328015558/@comment-2605:6001:F447:8400:B897:3AFE:3DA7:7D69-20180411191029

AnimeFreak40K wrote: Rizgis wrote: (The above statement does not reflect my opinion on events, both historical and ficitional, in any way. Actually I like Axis warships more, purely because of their design, both visual and technical. No politics involved) ...Gotta make sure I am not called out or anything :P I understand you completely.

I have a firm appreciation for the Zero fighter because of how amazing of an aircraft it was, and I share a very similar view for the Spitfire and P-38 for the same reasons.

In addition, I am also interested in seeing more stuff from between WWI and WWII (read; stuff like Bismarck), because of the shifts in military thought-processes and how that translated to ship construction and such.

...to be frank, I kind of wish the Devs kept were more willing to use international ships and such, as I think it would have allowed them to pace things out a bit better. I mean, as it is right now, it seems that they have all but run out of IJN capital ships...and I can't help but feel if things were paced better, there would still be some of these to look forward to. Tanaka himself said in one of last year's interviews I think, that in hindsight he would have withheld the Yamato class if he knew KanColle was going to last so long. Based on this statement I wonder if Tanaka had more faith in KanColle perhaps we would have withheld some of the more later Heavy Cruisers (Myokou class and later) too. Perhaps he would have waited withheld some of the earlier K2s as well. But neither he or we decide things on hindsight so we only make decisions that make sense to us at the time.