Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-25730832-20151013050733/@comment-1637496-20151105174620

Swordweaver wrote: Hyper Shinchan wrote: Admiral Mikan wrote: I really welcome Matsu-class, especially when they give us daihatsu for DDs...... Again, I don't know who started this idea but the Matsu class and No.1 class transports are not the same thing, albeit they're related. Do we really want -two- more classes of destroyer, though; not to mention a class that doesn't even have names. I think some people are thinking/hoping (just for brevity's sake) they'll mash the two together, with the Matsu-class getting daihatsu and ko-hyoteki on kai or something (since the No.1-class were based on the Matsu-class, and a couple Matsu-class got kaiten)

Of course that sort of thinking is like saying a Kagero-class would kai into a Yuugumo-class (shut up Akigumo), or a Fubuki-class into an Akatsuki-class

Like Qunow said both were Updates explicitly mentioned in the April 2015 Comptiq issue and Chinjufu Seikatsu no Susume vol.6. The lack of names has never been an issue with submarines.