Talk:Expedition/Reference tables/@comment-67.10.243.86-20150227185031/@comment-104.228.184.213-20150227220554

104.228 here (not the same anon as op btw) IIRC Exp#15 on the old page was listed as 2CVL and is now listed as 2 CV, so at face value it now seems to consume more resources.... atleast I think thats the op was getting at.