Talk:Expedition/@comment-26035487-20140327173125/@comment-24333595-20140328020155

^wrong

1.鐵罐裝備數量16個(塞滿艦隊全員所有的裝備數)　6隻編成　未有刷閃  26/53　=　49.0% (大成功次數/總實驗數)

6 ships, 16drums equipped, no sparkling, 25 out of 53 times great success. (49.0%)

2.每位艦娘各只裝上1個鐵罐　6隻編成　未有刷閃

60/104　=　57.6% (大成功次數/總實驗數)

6 ships, 1 drum each, no sparkling, 60 out of 104 times great success. (57.6%)

3.每位艦娘各只裝上1個鐵罐　6隻編成　全體刷閃

18/19　=　94.7% (大成功次數/總實驗數)

6 ships, 1 drum each, all sparkling, 18 out of 19 times great success. (94.7%)

以上的結果反映兩個事實:

1.對於「北方鼠輸送」這個新的遠征來說，只要不刷閃 鐵罐符合達成最低的裝備條件後再增加裝備數量是沒有意義的(機會都是一半半左右)

2.即使全體刷閃兼滿編6位艦娘出門 也有機會無法大成功回來

新遠征的出現可算是改寫了 "6位全刷閃=100%大成功"

Conclusion:

As long basic drum requirement is achieved, the great success rate is about 50% without sparkling.

Even with all ships sparkling, it will not always be great success.

This expedition demonstrated an example of 6 ships sparkling is not equal to 100% great success.