Talk:Murakumo/@comment-190.27.112.124-20150316205626/@comment-72.159.148.101-20150330194842

 Ok this walls of text are getting tiresome, but I will contribute with my own one.

 @Caboose10032 A trivia indeed is a place to made-up connections, you are confusing it as: Trivia=Facts. Trivia are just random things that may or may not have to do with the subject. In that sense, a nod is a trivia and don't need to be approved to the author, or like 190.25.26.82 said: unless someone can prove it with facts that it isn't a nod.

 @201.127.36.118 Again A "It MAY be reference" is NOT a valid argument to put that info in the trivia. Yes it can, because the trivia was written like it was a "nod" not a reference, see the difference? You are the one wording it like reference, and a nod can be in that section, why? Because Trivia ≠ Facts, just random musings that can be removed unless proven wrong. Now on this matter you keep citing the wrong things, what you posted cannot show us anything that we don't know, we need PROOF, -FACTUAL PROOF- you are the one that started this thing, based with your knowledge but also with your opinion, and you must at least show us that 彩樹 said that the thing she holds isn't a nod to that sword, because the other guy who put the trivia wrote it as a "nod" and you see, a nod isn't a fact.

 @The other Annons who said that it should be treated as a “Maybe” yes and no, to put it that way the “nod” must be proven right or wrong, the part that was supposed to prove it right just disappeared and didn’t prove that 彩樹 said it was a nod, and the part that want to prove it wrong isn’t showing us proof that 彩樹 didn’t said it was a nod. If he can’t prove it wrong either with that piece of proof, then it can stay as a “maybe”. IE: May be a nod to whatever thing that was.