Talk:Musashi/@comment-25336329-20150410062835/@comment-25490263-20150413081159

0- As the discussion is so far, it's a disagreement of personal styles. It is why there have been no further edits by me since this discussion began, though some changes may be discussed further if you're willing to continue debating styles.

The wiki listing implementation is closer to a preference, since neither of us have linked such a guideline & only provided rationales.

6- Your viewpoint is still not understandable to me. The note is clear to me - well, it was typed by me - & there should be no typos. There probably is a grammar error with 'is' not being 'are' though. If anything, there is a missing , tweaks, since some changes were of personal preference.

9- One, the name matched the link. Two, the link itself was clear as to where it linked. It was an optional link for more information - not a substitute with an obscured link.

The knowledge required for your version does not seem be an assumption nor has it been asserted by me what people usually do. A belief is not quite an assumption, but sure, it's not a fact either.