Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26091970-20150604000724/@comment-749631-20151001192633

I believe that should depend on execution. If, say, CVR is most-voted, then on all pages that are currently using CVB we can either write CVR(CVB), or write CVR but annotate it that it mean armored carrier and some call it CVB, and such. After we see more people actually accepted the term and moved onto the term and abandoned CVB we can then start removing some CVB reference from the wiki. Or if people turn out to be not using the term then we can phase out the voted term.

It is actually rather unlikely for dev to release something that is really categorized as large carrier instead of one of the game ecisting category in my opinion even for cases like release of Shinano, but it is still sonething possible, and, when dev do it, due to the previously announcwd BB-CV kai at level 1 proposal, it is very possible that we would only heard of its existence when devs are releasing maint notice and thus 15 mins before maint. end, and combined with the fact with shinano's nature it is very likely to be a 15 mins before a event start and in this sceanrio, we won't have time to change content on pages, and people's understanding.

But compare to what dev might do in the future, what concerned me the most is that even if you can't make it right, don't make it wrong.