User blog comment:Homuhomu123/Trigger Rates & Effectiveness of Anti-Air Cut-In (AACI)/@comment-26193115-20150528065509/@comment-25779449-20150530013356

Thank you for the comment.

The first 3 observations you mentioned were actually supported by the experiment reports above. Namely, multiple AACI ships in a fleet & activation priority of those ships (based on api values), plus efffects from individual AA stats.

According to the api categorization, you setup "20.3cm + 12.7cmHAFD + 90mm + AA radar" is actually classified as "B.B.R", or "Built-in + Built-in + Radar", api value 5. The main gun is only useful when Sanshiki (T3 shell) is also available, thus not considered in the pattern.

In addition, type 5 AACI "B.B.R" is achievable by any surface ship, not exclusive to Maya K2. To make it more effective, you may wanna try "H.C.R." instead, which is api_10.

As for error%, I guess the current sample sizes were a bit small to give any useful data, thus you may just take the reports above as some sort of "hints". But you do have a point there, %error is usually mandatory for most tests on probability, even if the author didn't calculate that by himself.

Thanks again for the concerns