Board Thread:Anime/@comment-25730832-20150304102908/@comment-26183083-20150308173051

Mohar Ikram wrote: 219.78.39.90 wrote: Mohar Ikram wrote: The first battle maybe yes since Ooi or Kitakami is the MVP I guess... but the second.... she is the MVP.....even though she is not the MVP, she's still the flagship....so, her exp is surely more than others...and, I understand the exp count... just cannot accept it how they interpreted it in this episode.... My rationalization to all this is that you can't Kai-Ni with only a few battles of any kind. So I figure that while Fubuki was leading her heavy fleet, the heavy fleet's fuel consumption means it is barely used, while Yuudachi's 3rd Fleet is light cruiser and destroyer and so with low resource consumption they got a LOT of missions, and this was the real margin that let Yuudachi Kai-Ni

I wonder if Naka Kai-Nied too without us knowing (L48). Don't make that assumption.... We don't even know the full fleet of Yuudachi in the anime.... And, If you want to show that Yuudachi is deserved to be kai-ni'd....Show it! Don't just said that "she makes practice in the morning after she knows that some destroyers already become a flagship"? What bullshit you gonna pull here? I watched Zak's review on youtube and I agree 100% with him...... The remodel episode is just not well established here.........I still think that Yuudachi is being Kai-ni'd just for the sake of her status as having a badass Kai-Ni design and tremendous stats(mainly FP and it being mention a lot in this episode!)..... You are right, we don't. I just suggest a hypothesis which at least fits with the known facts. Besides, there are some hints that Yuudachi's fleet is light. Note that she's singing with Naka. That implies Naka is the head. No heavy cruiser, or even light cruiser with dignity will let that happen (it certainly did not while Jintsu was in charge). So a very probable explanation is that Naka is the head, and any other ship will be no more than a light cruiser (like Abukuma who will be too soft spoken to stop her).

I definitely agree they should be showing it and don't disagree with the fact it is a shoddy article. Thanks for introducing me to Zak BTW - he is funny, but IMO could be funnier if he halves the lengths of his reviews (he repeats the same point one or two too many times).