Talk:Musashi/@comment-25336329-20150410062835/@comment-25490263-20150412091211

Natural, for English, is an endless abyss. It's flexibility is both a blessing & a curse.

1- Not seeing it doesn't count for much, given the above. Well, although that's more applicable in casual usage, even in formal usage, there's more than a few rules, & exceptions to those rules, that are difficult to remember due to being infrequently employed to such an extent as to become unnatural to use or being counterintuitive on first blush.

2-3- So far, this whole discussion is about preferences.

4- Indeed, but that next best alternative is so clunky as to being better off removed.

5- Minimum requirements do not seem applicable for notes & trivia sections on this casual website. It goes from two lines & an addendum to four lines combining two distinct events. It is arguable that that would improve readability, to me. It's certainly also proper writing, but this isn't a article or report. The point is clarity & brevity, to me.

6- Such is the nature of opinions.

7- If that is the route ahead, we might as well create a sandbox page & delve into the fun, fun intricacies of English. It's not clear what the relevance of the native language is as the language skill is more important.

8- Given it's what the developers said for that changelog & the following update's changelog, there is no reason to doubt it. Changelogs are not supposition.

9- The linking is for the details & not a substitute for the dates, especially as seeing thread numbers in the link doesn't tell the user anything. As it was, the first clause implies the second clause, which provides a clear time relativity & has a time reference. As it is now, the paragraph requires the knowledge of when Musashi was discovered, when the update was, & why two weeks was chosen. In other words, that visitors know the dates themselves & the update schedule.