Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25730832-20160122165904/@comment-26574811-20160124092903

5.189.18.240 wrote: Vcharng wrote: 5.189.18.240 wrote: Just tell me boy. How do you fell if you will have in the same fleet CV Kaga and CV Enterprise (which sunk Kaga), BB Kongou and SS Sealion (which sunk Kongou), Kirishima with South Dakota and Washington and so on.....

Just tell me if you OK with this. YES or NO? I'm not fighting WWII, so it's completely fine. I even have Akitsumaru and other IJN ships in the same fleet (centry-long hatred between IJA and IJN), and have Inazuma and Miyuki (sunk after collision with Inazuma) in the same fleet. This is actually a popular joke to play with the girls.

The reality is, we are not fighting WWII, what happened in the 40s won't happen here (that's why we can win the campaigns that the IJN historically lost), so it's not a problem at all. This is only YOURS opinion.

KC became THIS popular only because of its very faithful history side. If Jap commutity will be OK with new murican stuff then fck the Japan. I don't care if they are ready to spit to the tragical fate of their own Navy. If you don't care about my opinion, why bother asking in the prior post?

If you don't care about what everyone else is thinking, why bother discussing with us anyway?

By the way KC is not really faithful to history, remember all these "what-if remodels"? And the planned jets? And the removed Kaiten suicidal torpedoes from Ooi and Kitakami? And the wrong explaination about what decided Midway?