Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25730832-20160122165904/@comment-26574811-20160124081555

5.189.18.240 wrote: Vcharng wrote: 5.189.18.240 wrote: Playing all previous events which were poining to Solomon Islands battles or operations like "Hailstone" like NOT an Axis operation... seems legit. You have one more try boy. The bosses you fought against are Japanese ships, period.

If you insist that you are playing as Axis power, you may as well retire now. Actually you should have done so in AL/MI, where bosses clearly modeled after IJN ships first appeared. Just tell me boy. How do you fell if you will have in the same fleet CV Kaga and CV Enterprise (which sunk Kaga), BB Kongou and SS Sealion (which sunk Kongou), Kirishima with South Dakota and Washington and so on.....

Just tell me if you OK with this. YES or NO? I'm not fighting WWII, so it's completely fine.

I even have Akitsumaru and other IJN ships in the same fleet (centry-long hatred between IJA and IJN), and have Inazuma and Miyuki (sunk after collision with Inazuma) in the same fleet. This is actually a popular joke to play with the girls.

By the way...

Zuikaku's camouflage would not be possible if Shoukaku was still alive (would cause confusion as the camofulage makes any recognition symbols on the deck nearly invisible), in other words, '''Zuikaku Kai and K2 (but not K2A) is supposedly only available when your fleet, or rather your entire base, have no Shoukaku. Zuikaku can receive the camo, only because Shoukaku (and everyone else) was sunk, and thus there's no other fleet carrier to confuse with.'''

But I believe almost everyone here have put both of them (camo Zuikaku + Shoukaku) in the same fleet before, and probably will continue to do so.

The reality is, we are not fighting WWII, what happened in the 40s won't happen here (that's why we can win the campaigns that the IJN historically lost), so it's not a problem at all.