Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-1820055-20150701022818/@comment-26574811-20150801103432

Admiral Mikan wrote: I never said that we won't need 6++ carriers. I just don't agree with the point that devs actually encourage us to keep copies. Instead, they introduce different kinds of carriers, so we can understand more and more about the difference between each ship. Oh well, like Jenesis said, I think we can agree that we disagree here.

Sorry if my English isn't really that good. I'm Indonesian. I was referring to the guy who did argue that we won't need 6+ carriers though.

Yes, the main purpose of ship-locking is to have different ships, but the devs must have thought about the problem of limitied ships available to new players, so they left other ships with the same name unlocked, to reduce the impact to relatively new players who can't get more different ships. That's why I would say that the purpose of ship-locking "includes" copies, for it's the dev's way to make sure beginner/ intermediate TTKs have a chance on events as well. And, since they did this, it would be no longer necessary to lower the ship requirements for those guys.

That's why we should not jump to the conclusion that the devs won't demand so many carriers, because they already left ppl with enough options.