Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-25730832-20151013050733/@comment-26574811-20151106110152

Hyper Shinchan wrote: Vcharng wrote: From what I have said above, and from the fact that it is flatly pointless to introduce a slow (22kt), poorly armed (one duel 5-incher), barely useful "transport ship" (remember, a number of expeditions require destroyers), one highly possible way to deal with this is to introduce Matsu-class only, design their Kai according to the No.1-class transport, while still stubbernly call them Matsu-class destroyers. Exacly the same way as Taiho. This solves all problems. What problem? They introduced completely useless Akitsushima without making a sweat, at the very least the No.1 class transports can be used to carry Daihatsu in expeditions. And again, they explicitly mentioned both classes, but there would be no No.1 class by your logic here.

Well, they introduced 6-3 to allegedly let Type 2 flying boat shine (and failed). If they want to introduce No.1 class transport ships (note they are classified as transport ships, not destroyers), they may have to introduce new expeditions as well, while I don't think there are space for them. That's my concern.