Board Thread:Wikia Discussion/@comment-22224-20190129194843/@comment-251940-20190130032944

The letter does prove what I suspected. This isn't really an official letter.

Firstly, Kancolle_staff isn't run by DMM but C2 staff which is separate from DMM

Secondly, the DCMA executor must state the full business, not just the Twitter handle. In this case, it must be DMM.com Pty Ltd as per the Japanese business registry.

Next, the language is very primitive. There should be more formal wording such as 'We refer to the matter that a section of the website has been in breach of violating our intellectual property'. This sounds too informal to actually be a cease and desist. The section tacked on the end is very vague about how art assets are to be used.

I'd still insist on a formal letter with DMM.com logo and the whole shebang. This does NOT cut it.