Thread:McDerp/@comment-1421453-20160720211913/@comment-1421453-20160724012134

@McDerp, thanks for the pages that you've linked (although I had seen them before). They are quite fine but lacking some important details. I think I'll get in contact with them to add some little info instead of creating another 6000-word-guide :P

There are still a few things I'd like to suggest about the template. Compared to the spring event layout, yours has better things and worse things. I think there is only 1 main problem to work on:

"The aesthetical disorder, mainly caused by misplacement of some units and the amount of unnecessary emptiness."

The older layouts were far more aesthetic than yours (this is from someone who has graduated from a department of arts) because they were more compact. We could at least see something when we opened the page, but now, most of what we see is emptiness, sadly.

For me, what is NOT aesthetical is clear to see. I'll help you spot them :

Table of contents eat too much space. Yes, it can be useful, but as we are going to have a "collapse all" option, locating to where we want to go should not be a problem. Honestly, I don't want to see a white background when I open a page.

Rewards box is eating too much, again. I insist on this one, as many others have also said the same thing. Placing it there gives no aesthetical quality whatsoever. Do you perhaps want to show the names of the rewards? Then why did you use abbreviations in the first place? Actually, their names can be included in the infobox as well (though i don't think this will be better, since people will directly go to the equipments' pages to check their stats anyway). People pay attention to the rewards a lot, because it's one of the main things which they consider before attempting to clear a map in a particular difficulty.

Also, as you plan to move all the info about branching, tips, debuffs etc, to the later parts of the page, the current infobox might end up looking too long compared to the written text. As the main info and the infobox are side by side, there happens some inconsistencies when one of them is considerably longer.

I could say even more like but this is probably enough. (I don't want to look like my professors who criticized students' works like there was no tomorrow)

It'd be much better if this issue could be solved. Anyway, I've shared something on RFC page. I'd like to hear what you and also the community think about it.