Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-3502824-20170330044846/@comment-1637496-20170510203026

I'd be curious to read more about this "analysis" of the intelligence exchange with the British, anyway even the postwar naval intelligence report, the famous US Naval Technical Mission to Japan, used PF in reference to the kaibokan (pg.40 and following),



Never mind that PF avoids the overlapping between kaibokan and Matsu class and never mind that Taiwan used PF postwar, do we also have to ignore what the USN actually used when referring to the kaibokan because someone think that the actual USN classification should have been different?