Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26091970-20150604000724/@comment-749631-20150927204103

42.60.228.10 wrote: "what they do is not discussion only throwing argument at everyone"

My suggestion is simple: like we use slow and fast BB when we had to differentiate them, we use regular and armoured CV here.

I have no idea why nobody could understand it, so it's been tough trying to explain things I didn't think needed explaining. As doing so would mean lacking the capability to simply say I have send a fleet with 2CVR4CA to 2-2 or anything similar, and also the current system implemented in the wiki mandate the need of using these type of shortened alphabetic code in places like fleet composition template while lacking the compatibility and undesired to give two different ship types (in game data sense) a same code.