Talk:World 6/@comment-4981281-20160708140708

This is a small test I conducted by myself. In the image, important points marked in red. For the sake of simplicity, I will not state the subtypes of BB and CV ship types (FBB, BBV, CVL, CVB) and simply write them as such.

My first point is: This composition satisfies the requirement written above for going F-H, both in terms of ship and eLoS. The 2 eLoS value are reasonably acceptable for HQ level 106 in failing the first check to I and passing the second one. I may have missed something (which may have been written in the article or not) for my fleet to head towards E instead of H, but what may that be is the important thing. I have arrived to several possible conclusions:
 * 1) Using 2CV and 1LHA will direct the fleet to E regardless of eLoS .
 * 2) Using 2CV and 0DD will direct the fleet to E regardless of eLoS . This assumption has basis in that both recommended compositions above for the route B-F-H/I-K use 1BB 1CV 2DD while not having 2CV 0DD; the table also state that with a minimum of 2DD and maximum of 1BB 1CV, the route to E is cancelled.
 * 3) The combination of the two points above.
 * 4) There is a leap in the eLoS requirement for going H between HQ 105 and 106, which I think is strange. The reason is stated below.

My second point is: As far as I know it, the "eLoS" mentioned in this article is the outcome of a formula that incorporates HQ level. Therefore, instead of saying "eLoS requirement rises with HQ level", it should be "to maintain eLoS with a rising HQ level, measures have to be taken". It doesn't make sense if the higher your HQ level, the further your eLoS will fall while the higher the requirement will rise. If the requirement rises, then the eLoS must has yet to take HQ level into consideration during calculation.

My third point is: <span class=explain title="while writing this comment (on my home's PC, using the Monobook skin), I had to leave it to do something else for about an hour and a half. When I return, finish my comment and post it, the page simply don't show the comment, and when rolling up top, there's a banner saying that my login session has timed out and my actions have been reverted. Welp, having a long comment completely disappearing when you post it, and there is no way to make it re-appear. I had to retype this bunch from scratch. It's like the system saying 'You have to go AFK? Well then, fuck your text, we'll just delete all your effort with no prior notice. Take that you bitch for not typing into Notepad as a backup beforehand'. At any rate, this comment is an attempted reconstruction of my first comment. I may have forgotten to write something from the original post in.">Rather long wall of ranting text.