Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-3502824-20170829010745/@comment-2605:6001:F440:E900:D8E3:DC8F:8229:C1D8-20170912144424

Cemenotar wrote: Ar-cen-ciel wrote: Viet Anh Vu wrote: Is Ark Royal consider large? If so, I think the upcoming Kai 2 is not Sara but her. Ark Royal is heavier than than Hiryuu in displacement but she's nowhere as large as Saratoga. Not to mention that Saratoga was the largest CV at the time of her commissioning, and is the largest foreign aircraft carrier we have right now. well for "nowhere as large" she is just 30 meters shorter - nowhere as heavy - yeah probably. also as far as I can keep track of RN carriers largest RN carrier during WW2, which could place her into position of "large" aircraft carrier.

The whole situation is kind of funny to me, myself because while there are heavy obvious hints towards saratoga there are also numerous less obvious hints which can be seen only when you have high enought knowledge on history of certain ships - leading toward Ark. Which kinda goes into setup where no matter the outcome someone does get trolled - be it Sara fans, or guys with more knowledge than is healthy for this game ;)

and then personally also I'd not create hype for any specific ship until CGI teases will get posted during downtime.

PS. I don;t understand why so many people are so insinstent onto using displacement to compare "sizes" of ships - alot of modern destroyers have displacement above heavy cruisers of WW2 - does that make them bigger? heck no, they are in fact still smaller ships - just packed with more stuff If Ark Royal was going to get her K2 during her debut she would have had it during the event not afterwards. Anyone who thought it was Ark Royal were even more deluded than people who thought it would Aquila. Also the discussion on who would get the K2 should have ended when we had not one, two but 4 different planes as ranking rewards. And no they don't hint at the planes in RN service or else they would have british markings and have mk I or mkII in their name.