Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25730832-20160122165904/@comment-27678539-20160126081623

Sshinka wrote: Notice that my post was a reply to post saying that Iowa should have the same if not better luck stat than Yukikaze. If someone wanted Yamato, Musashi, or Mutsu to have same luck as Yukikaze, i would write simmilar post. Ships that went through so many bloody engagements throughout the WW2 with only few scraches are extreamly rare, and  there is no ship that i know of that can be compared to Yukikaze in that regard.

And i did not made up anything. Your reply just shows your ignorance and/or lack of knowledge on the topic. Point is, luck is subjective. You could've argued that the threats faced by the Iowa class were significantly lighter, but you didn't. You went all "they didn't do anything," which is silly.

You literally claimed the Allies somehow prevented the Japanese from surrendering for months just to test out the atomic bombs on them. Seriously dude, you took a controversial subject that is still hotly debated to this day, and went straight into tinfoil hat territory.

123.2.212.1 wrote: Not that I'm defending him but.. They were talking about  Luck  here. Luck stats ≠ Normal stats. Do try to read properly. I understand the salt in this thread is high but that's no reason to create delusional ideas of persecution to defend your precious allied ship at the first sign of disagreement Right back at you. "Delusional ideas of persecution" where, exactly? He's taking out his irrational anger at a game change on people who have nothing to do with this, lol. That's not persecution, it's just pathetic.

In any case, it's pretty clear that justification for a high luck stat can be highly subjective.