Talk:Akashi's Improvement Arsenal/@comment-24786587-20150601034746/@comment-24786587-20150604172144

sigh, I hate to say this but isn't that the main reason to know which fit gun for which ship? of course for event, who gives a damn about non-event use.

first thing, I overlevel my event ships, people will wonder why should I concern about accuracy with overweight guns, the main reason is because I'm hardcore player at heart, I respect the game and understand that not all players play like me, let alone have lv90+ ships. And we have been told to use fit gun for the best accuracy, first we need to know which gun for which ship. At first there was no official announcement about it (in your case, your magazine source), people relied on tests, not just one test, but huge amount of tests by different (and generous) players.

their and my conclusion is just like yours (and magazine table), hence my original post, EXCEPT one, the questionable 46cm gun on Yamato-class.

I never say test data is absolute correct for infinite time. they have limitation too and subject to obsolete if dev changed the formula.

about test data, your comment: (No matter how many runs they do.If the error is that high. It's not guanratee.) , sorry that I can't agree with this, seems like you misunderstood about 'standard error', I'm no math expert and I threw away my maths long time ago, but at least I know that the standard error will tend to closer to zero the bigger the sample size is. besides, the data of 3 different gun sizes are about the same sample size. imo, 400 samples is convincing enough, it will just improve i.e. lower error the more test performed.

@Soiberi1, I'm not saying your magazine source is wrong, in fact this discussion is not to prove who's right/wrong, it's up to reader who really into this matter, judge for themselves, since it's their own game.