Thread:Ckwng/@comment-26091666-20160204000158/@comment-26091666-20160204063352

As for predominantly the first and last paragraph, that stuff is still there: Sandbox/Enemy Vessels

The reason why I did not sort of pursue with that one was partial disagreeing with the vertical alignment which we haven't got to the bottom of and since then that was that.

Personally, I'd somewhat like to see Enemy Vessel page getting something like tabview because what somewhat worries more over time is the possibility of hitting the transclusion limitations. That, and I really don't like long pages but that is even more personal than the former case involving transclusion limitations.

In regards to turning Enemy Vessel into a summary page like Ship list or Equipment. You're pretty much thinking along the same wavelength as Qunow. Earlier on I spoke to Qunow via Special:Chat and he pointed out List of fleet standard aircraft carriers by upgraded maximum stats as example but with some changes notably:
 * To include lesser information in the new Enemy Vessel page because already the individual Abyssal pages themselves already has all the information.
 * To include images - I think he meant something like using Template:ShipBattleCardKai which currently is what I pushed onto the main Enemy Vessel page. The only problem with that is the transclusion limitation is what I fear may happen sooner or later. He later suggested putting it into tabs - which I can picture as tabview as a way to bypass the transclusion.

Somehow, if now I could involve at least one more other regular Enemy Vessel page editor such as Rambern4 or probably another content-moderator like myself, がか to either agree on one of the two following suggestions above. The main thing that the current Enemy Vessel page disgusts me really the amount of coding efforts just to keep the page "alive and going" so to speak. That and needless to say the roundabout incident with the use of:
 * Visual editors that threw in more redundant junk, worse bloating the page up. Things like "font-weight: normal" on virtually every line was really unneeded.
 * The use of  coding in a bid to have a different style of bullets which lead to erroneous output of  outputs because what works in Google Chrome browser doesn't and didn't work with Internet Explorer as well, vice versa.
 * The inconclusive agreement with now the newer layouts of what Enemy Vessel page should ideally look like minus the ability to have excessive customisation options available - ideally it should be made into a Template in some shape or form so that it is easier to scale in the future. Worse is well, me throwing Ambox there for a few months now and we're still looking at the old page layout.

Two thirds of that issue involving roundabout solution has been solved for now, the last one involving the push for the newer layout hasn't come into any form of agreement (yet).

Anyway I am getting long-winded here. I'll omit my opinion on the Vietnamese's version of Enemy Vessel page and instead look forward to hearing from you about your opinions on these matters.