Board Thread:Wikia Discussion/@comment-28069733-20170526022034/@comment-28069733-20170527155051

Fujihita wrote: The revision history disagrees with your self-evaluation. I'll give you two more green ticks on proofread and discussion but your definition of research game mechanics and frontlining is too lax, compared to the likes of Hayashi, Homuhomu and ArticaFrost.

Dont kid yourself, you judge me based on what you see through the history instead of wondering where the hell I obtained my data from. If you want to turn this into a strategy talk, I can provide you plenty of reasons how flawed your plan is to recommend people to build the just because it has  stat. You claim to be someone who can judge who is researcher or not? Don't make me laugh, you can't even provide a legitimate advice to someone.

My point that you're inactive and is thus incapable of judging others stands. Instead of living under the rock, how about you actually participate in the talks on KC Discord?

Fujihita wrote:

Plus, that's rich coming from someone claiming people are resigning / going inactive because of CDRW. The only person resigned around here is Smokey and he resigned because he's bored of KanColle. Everyone else just went inactive because of RL, other interests, etc. Correlation is not the same as causation and in this case, there is no reason to believe it is. I can say the same about you, considering you're also the only person now who is actually willing to defend CDRW. The official reasons are either resignation through boredom or other interests, but it seems that you have never really bothered to talk to them in person, or you're probably never close to them at all. Considering that one of them actually went inactive with you being the reason, for all I know, you're now spouting bullshit to keep this story off the track.

Fujihita wrote:

Now I see no reason behind this charade. Why are are we talking about removing a member of the staff to solve the lack of staff again? CDRW's has one job; his job is to appoint the right people to the right jobs. Appointing just about anyone to look well-staffed on the surface contradicts his job description.

Also, members of the staff have full autonomy over their actions. There is no such a thing as a group, "minority", or "majority" decision. If you want to back up your decision, you'll have to cite names. General terms like "Everyone", "Most people" won't get past the filter.

In any case, keep spouting anti-establishment buzzwords like "upper echelon", "overrule", "position of power", and "getting in the way", etc. I'll go watch some more Trump news.

Are you even paying attention to what is happening here? Or are you here just to spite me, because you can? This motion is set in the first place because he does not think that we need more staff members and refuses to bring more people to the table, do you think I'm trying to settle a personal vendetta against him or something? Of the whole staff list, the only ones who are active are me, Death Usagi, Mikado, がか, Chocolatecravinghobo and Qunow. Meanwhile, Crazy teitoku, Zel-melon, ArcticaFrost and LostLogia4 are pretty much inactive as of lately due to being busy. As for the rest, they are inactive but might as well have resigned because they have not done anything active at all during the last year.

So either you bring something to the table that can actually solve our existing issue, or go back to hiding under a rock because you don't seem to be serious in willing to fix this mess.