Talk:Iowa/@comment-35182244-20160722015644/@comment-35182244-20160725043629

Due to the squabble occurring in the first place. We're currently investigating:


 * How the mention of Bonin English go there in the first place.
 * Factors related to the feasibility and justification of keeping it there

Also, quite true. The phrase "Engrish" is very incorrect in my description. User:Rephira and I agree that Engrish is more of a sentence that is completely in English but utterly butchered, while Iowa simply speaks in broken English or rather "a weird mixture of English and Japanese that is rather incoherent".

Still. I am not without sympathy towards our anon's opinions. Thus I am willing to look into this. What sparked opposition from me in the first place was the manner of addressing and actions they chose. I'll fish around and try look for corpora related to Bonin English that documents its grammar patterns. If I deem the evidence insufficient in the end I will remove it from the note itself and leave it in the trivia for less prominence, but as an interesting tidbit to linguists.