Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-85.152.222.57-20161222120438/@comment-28069733-20161223203136

>Dear Tsubakura, you don't seem to look at the whole thing.

For someone who claims that a CVB has a lot of drawbacks, I find it rather amusing that you're telling me this.

>What you said is undoubtedly true, but it's also true that CVB can't have the same fighter power and opening air strike of CV

Which I've already stated long ago as one of the advantages of CV, but apparently you don't realize the impact the other advantages of a CVB makes.

>Also, if CVB was truly superior why the devs made her reversible?

Irrelevant, reversible models doesn't prove shit.

''>This looks a bit like the question "Yamato or Iowa, which one was the best WWII battleship?" (CVB = Yamato / CV= Iowa)''

Yeah right, you're trying to compare a BB with a FBB, which are fundamentally different in role and function. Try a better example next time.

>but because this game is RNG based I prefer to stay on the safe side and having as much extra FP as possible (therefore CV is better for the role I need).

If you actually care about staying on the safe side as you've claimed, then the CVB is superior having much and  stats. And what about the scenario where you actually fail to destroy them and your ships gets sent to 中破 ? If it was a regular CV, that is a lot of FP gone. You're bullshitting with the claim that CV is still better if you want to play it on the safe side, your strategy is more of an all or nothing.

Heck, I'm going to rest my case here, since this was supposed to be a question regarding whether CVB or CV Shoukaku is better and I think the OP already has the idea which one to choose.

I can only advice you that you should read the damn wikia and confirm your facts before you start giving advice. Bad advice is the cancer of this community after all.