Talk:Quests/@comment-25733368-20150710001330/@comment-25733368-20150710013057

>There are 178 quests on this page, if you want to come up with your own page that you consider better, then please, go ahead.

>But for now, the page will remain as is. It is not changing.

Of course I can come up with something much better. Undoing your changes would be more than enough. Offering an option to choose the layout would kill two birds with one stone. First, making things usable again. Second, satisfying your ego. However, you'll most likely never agree to that based on past changes to wikia

Also nice to see you're showing this kind of attitude just because someone outright showed where you're wrong. Says a lot about you. Normal person would provide counterarguments to defend the changes which happened intead of your "I made the changes so they have to stay". If you can only make things worse, simply don't do any changes.

@ArcticaFrost, first of, all, learn some English as I can barely understand what you typed. Pool is a body of still water. The poll is about hover images and I'm NOT talking about them, they're nice eye candy addition, even if useless. If you meant the thread which is completely different thing - I said below, it isn't representative of the users in the slightest because vast majority of people reading wikia never enter those threads. The threads are filled with people who are active in the wikia and often make the changes just for the sake of it, like what happened with expeditions. Other people tend to get hyper about any kind of change without considering their real effects. What the hell is "citizie"? My critique is extremely constructive because I'm clearly showing how the page looked before and explaining why it was better, using objective measure - amount of quests displayed on screen. You should take your own advice about "formulate it good" and "If you don't want to contribute with something good, shut it then". You are the one crying, as you didn't say a single thing of worth, nor did you counter a single thing I said and only showed that you can't even type a short post in your attempt to make me shut up as you can't handle people actually voicing their discontent.

@Dragonjet, I'd say "disgusting" is a fitting word for situation when everything suddenly takes up twice as much space. But okay, I'll stay with "bloated" which is just as viable as "barely noticeable" SmokeyTheButt used. As for community and reacting, see above. You should have the data of how many people visit the site and how many voiced their opinions in that thread. Difference is huge, so your argument is faulty at best.