Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25730832-20160122165904/@comment-1915363-20160407025002

72.145.249.127 wrote: Ar-cen-ciel wrote: That is a very real concern since this game is, well, primarily targeted to Japanese audience. I don't see how it is a concern; I don't expect them to put the entire US navy in the game, and a few of the Japanese ships have already been overshadowed by some of the Germans and Italians in the game; adding one or two Americans or Brits shouldn't be that big of a deal, especially if they cherry pick a few older but famous ships from earlier in the war who weren't specifically built to combat the Japanese and so wouldn't necessarily be better than them or have better equipment. We all know that Iowa-class's specs does live up to her incredible stats in Kancolle, and we don't have problem with that (apart from a minority complaints). But Iowa is just the tip of the iceberg and we don't really know how USN shipgirls will be implemented at this point, With the implementation being left open to speculation, some would even go as far as claiming they're gonna break the existing Kancolle mechanics to prove their superiority, all that being nothing more than crazy daydreams from rabid fanbase.

Only rabid Type 2 Eaglelander really meant that. And this thread is filled with them, because this is the kind of thread it is. That's just it though; there are only complaints about the Type 2 Eaglelanders, but the similarly toned "Nippon sekai-ichi!" crowd is either conveniently ignored or actually praised despite it essentially being the same behavior about different countries.

What are you trying to prove by claiming the existence of such a perceived hypocrisy anyway? All I see is a bunch of concern over the foreign shipgirl implementations in Kancolle, which is perfectly normal in the context of this thread. If there is an elephant named "hypocrisy" right here in this thread, then prove it.