Talk:World 3/@comment-203.215.116.152-20150929025349/@comment-202.166.14.133-20151002074032

Ah yes. In doubt, change your argument to blame RNG. Which is why I said "RNG-based strategy instead of optimal set ups" earlier. But if it possible, why not use the optimal "best stat" ships? Or as another way to put it, would you recommend other people to bring Mutsuki-class to 3-5? Because that's how I see it.

Your RNG and your "friends" RNG regarding radar is your own confirmation bias. They're worth as much as the "Sparkling increases taiha" opinion that appeared during Summer 2015

By the way, you were talking about HQ100 >"  they haven't experienced the hardness of HQ  above 100 in 3-5."<  (which is heaps more HQ exp compared to HQ 85). Stop changing/twisting your argument just to be correct. It really reflects on how much you're grasping at straws to recover some "pride". Lol its hilarious to read

"Generic" plans are up there because they're optimal plans. Sure with enough RNG, anything can work (If it doesn't take a few more sorties).

Lol incompetent TTK oblivious to his own incompetence calling other people incompetent. How original. If that's the way this is headed then I'm out