Talk:Suggestion/@comment-1820055-20150308090352/@comment-25490263-20150310101810

Says the person who mixed a design example with a suggestion.

Says the person who is actively discussing the design.

Says the person who says design is being iterated upon.

Says the person who is actively defending the design 1.

Says the person who is actively defending the design 2.

You opened the door to discussing the design. You cannot act as it the onus was on me. An opinion was provided that approved of the redesign with disagreement with the design. As the suggestion was worded, that is a perfectly satisfactory response.

Asking what everyone thinks while posting two images, saying it's already in progress with before I put more effort into this, & then expecting no comments about the image.... ....[R]edesigning the Frontpage is a minor takeaway in such a context. Pictures are pretty, aren't they?

You initiated the design discussion & continue to blame it on me? Smooth.

Of course mobile will be discussed in a conversation about visuals & resolutions. The issue is readability on screen sizes ranging from 5-inches to 40+ inches with resolutions ranging from 240x360 to 4k. The internet can be accessed on anything in those ranges. 'Windows versus Mac' is a disagreeable analogy given this 'application' is perfectly accessible to anything with an internet connection.

Absolute rules? You wanted an explanation, One was provided. You disagreed. A rebuttal was posted. Not once has what to do been said. Everything said is specifically regarding what's wrong with the proposed design with examples & analogies to hone the point.

So the key words are I think rather than the existing knowledge that is my perspective & the lack of the support or oppose templates? Really? Every line evidently needs to be prefaced with I think now? Really? Not even the fact not once was it stated these were standards or that the second & third posts were in response to your questions? No website or literature examples being sourced? No alternative layouts being discussed? No counter images to show a supposed better design provided? In a thread asking for opinions? Oh wow, hold the presses, out of the infinite ways to phrases sentences, the infinite combination of words....All that mattered was were a couple obvious words on a suggestion thread while trading opinions on a random website because reasons.

Nope, nope, a simple 'Ctrl+F' shows the only what should be is yours. As are the two usages of spew.

Ah hah, now you read the whole comment, unlike the far shorter & basic first comment.

The problem would've never occurred if you stuck to the alleged intention & focused on the concept of redesigning rather than what redesign.

The fact this discussion is still continuing into the eighth comment shows this isn't just about the concept but a particular design.