Board Thread:Game Updates/@comment-3502824-20180328015558/@comment-28069733-20180331045957

Vcharng wrote:

They translated 海防艦 into Escort, but not the other way around, enough said. Also, 護衛 in 護衛駆逐艦, just like "escort" in "destroyer escort (or reversed)", is an adjective, the Escort (ship) in the ship card is a noun, using 護衛 as a noun will be a big problem in modern Japanese context as all their JMSDF's surface ships, including helicopter carriers, are known as 護衛艦 (escort ship), which means this is something the devs, as modern Japanese, will never do. By using the term 護衛(adj.)駆逐艦(n.), they have dictated that the US DE is essentially a destroyer. Aaaaand the torpedo thing, don't forget that. Also please think about how a Kaiboukan could represent the performance of Sammy B. It can't, quite flatly. The only thing I've put out is that the possibility exists and none of your arguments so far actually disproves it, it merely lowers the probability of it happening, which is kinda useless because we will find out how it will be implemented sooner or later lol.

You would probably insist on PF if the Kaiboukan gets a change, but what are your thoughts on the other classifications? =w=