Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26091970-20150604000724/@comment-26574811-20150927090410

42.60.228.10 wrote:

Also I think you're going to be screwed if the devs actually add in the Illustrious and Implacable class CVs in the future. Not a good reason if you ask me. Even more so if they also add in the Essex class as well.

^So remind me again how you guys separated fast and slow BBs? Essex was not an armored carrier. Her armor was applied on the hangar deck, not flight deck.

One last thing:

You guys do realize that the definition of "Large/Heavy" shifts from era to era, and from country to country, don't you? Why are we using the Yanks' standard on the Japs' ships for starters?

For USN, only Midway is considered "Large Carrier", but for RN, Illustrious/Implacable is already the biggest thing they have in the whole damn war, why can't they call them "Large Carriers"?

And IJN? The devs already used the term "large carrier" on Shoukaku (and previously, on Kaga in the library), in case if anyone missed. I have to say that the problem never even existed.