Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26091970-20150604000724/@comment-26410405-20150926171202

42.60.228.10 wrote: "But really, you want to separate BB into different subclasses, which historically wasn't the case with US Navy as they all been classified as BB, but you want to keep all standart carriers regardless of their size, having armored deck and function classified as CV which is the direct opposite?"

wut

I already finalised my stand to split CVs into "unarmoured CV" and "armoured CV", didn't I?

Yes, and I don't mind that unlike that guy above us, however I would leave unarmoured CV as just CV. I do mind to introduce more battleship subclasses though. It's good as it is now.